Community
Participate
Working Groups
The content types page looks potentially very powerful, due to its ability to generalize similar file formats. For example, I'd expect to be able to register a new editor (or change the default editor) for all XML files or all text files (which could potentially eliminate a lot of tedium in listing every file extension that is really an XML file and registering it with my favorite XML editor). As an experiment, I tried to change the default editor for the "text" content type. Seeing the message on the top of the page, I went to the "File Associations" page. However, the file associations page can only create associations between file extensions and editors, which is not what I want (I want an association between a content type and an editor). Without the ability to create an association between a content type and an editor, most of the potential power of content types seems to disappear. Here's how I'd expect it to work: - There is only a "File Associations" page (no separate content types page). - The upper pane shows the tree of content types - not file extensions. - The bottom pane shows associated editors (as it does now). - There is a new "Properties..." button (or Edit...) that allows the user to configure the content type (edits the associated file extensions and default character set which are currently set in the "content types" page. Should also allow an icon to be specified for the content type). Even if it doesn't work exactly as I describe, the important parts of this enhancement are: 1. editor associations should be based on content types, not file extensions 2. the associations should be done using a single preference page, not two 3. the properties of a content type (file extensions, char set, etc.) should be edited in a properties dialog for the content type.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 91965 ***