Community
Participate
Working Groups
Two problesm: When just one .java file is dirtied, Save All doesn't become enabled. When Save All is enabled and is then selected it doesn't become disabled.
Was not able to recreate can you describe the steps you used? Were you using the latest 3.0 build?
I am using RC2 which was first available on Monday (not, as the web site indicates, on Friday). BTW 1, I'm getting a lot of the following e.g. if I open Eclipse in a terminal I see it and at other times such as when inserting a breakpoint (a dialog pops up): java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.AST.newTryStatement(AST.java:1960) at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTConverter.convert(ASTConverter.java:2114) at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTConverter.convert(ASTConverter.java:1855) at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTConverter.convert(ASTConverter.java:1910) at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTConverter.convert(ASTConverter.java:1813) at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTConverter.convert(ASTConverter.java:2055) at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTConverter.convert(ASTConverter.java:1837) at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTConverter.convert(ASTConverter.java:770) at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTConverter.buildBodyDeclarations (ASTConverter.java:336) at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTConverter.convert(ASTConverter.java:274) at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTConverter.convert(ASTConverter.java:152) at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.AST.convertCompilationUnit(AST.java:253) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.core.ReconcileWorkingCopyOperation.executeOperation (ReconcileWorkingCopyOperation.java:81) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.core.JavaModelOperation.run (JavaModelOperation.java:700) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.core.JavaModelOperation.runOperation (JavaModelOperation.java:739) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.core.CompilationUnit.reconcile (CompilationUnit.java:1098) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.ui.text.java.JavaReconcilingStrategy.reconcile (JavaReconcilingStrategy.java:88) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.ui.text.java.JavaReconcilingStrategy.initialReconcile (JavaReconcilingStrategy.java:156) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.ui.text.CompositeReconcilingStrategy.initialReconcile (CompositeReconcilingStrategy.java:114) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.ui.text.JavaCompositeReconcilingStrategy.initialReconci le(JavaCompositeReconcilingStrategy.java:122) at org.eclipse.jface.text.reconciler.MonoReconciler.initialProcess (MonoReconciler.java:104) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.ui.text.JavaReconciler.initialProcess (JavaReconciler.java:304) at org.eclipse.jface.text.reconciler.AbstractReconciler$BackgroundThread.run (AbstractReconciler.java:169) Unhandled event loop exception Reason: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError BTW 2, the Find/Replace dialog plus cut/copy is totally screwed in RC2 (rather than being just regular screwed prior to RC2). I don't know if this is related, i.e. something in the core creating havoc in several places. (I've reported this as BUG 67369.) BTW 3: I have the latest integration builds of VE, EMF and GEF installed but I don't think they are causing the problems.
The noclassdef found error is suspicious. We really need to have reproducable steps in order to fix the bug.
I'm not saying that the noclassdef is the source of the Save All bug, its just that it happens a lot on my installation of RC2. In fact, upon further investigation I reckon it's _not_ associated with this Save All bug. I can now characterise the Save All bug better: it happens only for large files, e.g. non-trivial source code with > 1000 lines. Small files don't cause the problem but large files do every time. So, it's not so much that > 1 files need to be dirtied for Save All to become enabled but that a 'small' file needs to be dirtied.
I cannot reproduce your bug. Passing to JDT Core for comment about the exceptions in the log.
We have now a specific bug for the NoClassDefFoundError error: bug 67969, please use it to follow this error (I will add reporter as CC of this bug...). I put back this bug in JDT/UI land to let them decide to resolve it as worksforme for the Save All menu item issue...
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 67590 ***
