Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 64742 - [EditorMgmt] Duplicate notification for saving dirty editor
Summary: [EditorMgmt] Duplicate notification for saving dirty editor
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 17102
Alias: None
Product: Platform
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: UI (show other bugs)
Version: 3.0   Edit
Hardware: All All
: P2 major (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Douglas Pollock CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-05-31 10:31 EDT by Philipe Mulet CLA
Modified: 2004-07-13 16:59 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments
Observe dup entry (19.78 KB, image/jpeg)
2004-05-31 10:32 EDT, Philipe Mulet CLA 		no flags Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Philipe Mulet CLA 2004-05-31 10:31:01 EDT 
Build 200405290105

After editing a file several times, I decided to reload released version 
instead, and got prompted for saving unsaved changes.

However, there were duplicate entries in the dialog offering to save dirty 
editor contents, see attached screenshot.
Comment 1 Philipe Mulet CLA 2004-05-31 10:32:00 EDT 
Created attachment 11321 [details]
Observe dup entry
Comment 2 Philipe Mulet CLA 2004-05-31 18:49:32 EDT 
Forgot to mention I use multiple windows.

After that point where I reloaded the file from CVS, I switched to other 
window, and there the offending editor was still opened, and prompted me 
whether I wanted to load newer file from disk vs. keep dirty editor content.
Same occurred in a subsequent window. Looks like I got prompted initially (see 
pb description) for each instance of an editor on this file, and even though I 
didn't choose to save them, they did not get discarded and stood dirty.
Comment 3 Douglas Pollock CLA 2004-07-13 16:18:12 EDT 
Confirmed on Linux-GTK with multiple windows in 3.0.  The editor appears twice 
in the dirty list as the screenshot indicates.
Comment 4 Douglas Pollock CLA 2004-07-13 16:59:27 EDT 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 17102 ***