Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 64481 - Members pane blanked out when updating a whole source file. [browsing]
Summary: Members pane blanked out when updating a whole source file. [browsing]
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 62854
Alias: None
Product: JDT
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: UI (show other bugs)
Version: 3.0   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Dani Megert CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-05-27 20:48 EDT by Gary Gregory CLA
Modified: 2004-05-28 11:13 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Gary Gregory CLA 2004-05-27 20:48:15 EDT 
Version 3.0.m9.

In the Java Browsing Perspective, from our CVS HEAD Project, I selected a Java
class "C". Select All (Ctrl-A), Copy.

In the Java Browsing Perspective, in a different Project for a CVS branch "B" we
have,  I selected the same class "C". Select All (Ctrl-A), Delete, Paste. The
class "C" from HEAD has more methods than the same class from the branch I
pasted into.

After the paste, the Members pane becomes EMPTY.
Save, the Members pane is still EMPTY.
Right-click on the class in the Types view, Refresh, the Members pane is still
EMPTY.
Comment 1 Frederic Fusier CLA 2004-05-28 09:40:06 EDT 
Cannot reproduce while copying/pasting a sample java class between 2 separated
projects.
May you attach the classes you were copying/pasting content?
Also, have you any stack traces/errors in the log when Outline became empty?
Thx
Comment 2 Philipe Mulet CLA 2004-05-28 09:54:56 EDT 
This would be likely a UI bug anyway.
Comment 3 Dirk Baeumer CLA 2004-05-28 11:05:36 EDT 
Dani, I suspect that this is caused by the same problem as described in bug 
62854.
Comment 4 Dani Megert CLA 2004-05-28 11:13:59 EDT 
Yes that would explain it. Cannot reproduce using I20405280010

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 62854 ***