Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 59758 - Threads "Thread[main,6,main]" and "Worker-2" are concurrently trying to.....
Summary: Threads "Thread[main,6,main]" and "Worker-2" are concurrently trying to.....
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 59401
Alias: None
Product: Platform
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: CVS (show other bugs)
Version: 3.0   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: platform-cvs-inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-04-23 05:34 EDT by Johan Compagner CLA
Modified: 2004-04-23 08:18 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Johan Compagner CLA 2004-04-23 05:34:04 EDT
In the latest 2 integration builds (0420 and 0422) i get these kind of messages 
in the console when starting eclipse:

!ENTRY org.eclipse.osgi apr 23, 2004 11:22:36.428
!MESSAGE Threads "Thread[main,6,main]" and "Worker-2" are concurrently trying to
 start  bundle org.eclipse.team.cvs.ui. Thread "Thread[main,6,main]" was trying
to load "org.eclipse.team.internal.ccvs.ui.subscriber.SubscriberCommitAction" wh
ich now may have inconsistent values.
!ENTRY org.eclipse.osgi apr 23, 2004 11:22:41.435
!MESSAGE Threads "Thread[main,6,main]" and "Worker-2" are concurrently trying to
 start  bundle org.eclipse.team.cvs.ui. Thread "Thread[main,6,main]" was trying
to load "org.eclipse.team.internal.ccvs.ui.subscriber.SubscriberCommitOperation"
 which now may have inconsistent values.
!ENTRY org.eclipse.osgi apr 23, 2004 11:22:48.335
!MESSAGE Threads "Thread[main,6,main]" and "Worker-2" are concurrently trying to
 start  bundle org.eclipse.team.cvs.ui. Thread "Thread[main,6,main]" was trying
to load "org.eclipse.team.internal.ccvs.ui.subscriber.CVSSubscriberOperation" wh
ich now may have inconsistent values.
Comment 1 Michael Valenta CLA 2004-04-23 08:18:35 EDT

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 59401 ***