Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 54317 - [Font/Colour] Areas of the new Eclipse UI does not respect the Windows high contrast "rules".
Summary: [Font/Colour] Areas of the new Eclipse UI does not respect the Windows high c...
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 63220
Alias: None
Product: Platform
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: UI (show other bugs)
Version: 3.0   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: 3.0 M9   Edit
Assignee: Kim Horne CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-03-10 11:55 EST by James Ciesielski CLA
Modified: 2004-05-20 16:54 EDT (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description James Ciesielski CLA 2004-03-10 11:55:01 EST
(using "High Contrast Black (extra large)" scheme)

View tabs:
1. The tabs change color (in this case to a dark purple), and the font color 
remains black (should be white) and does not become bold.
2. When these tabs lose their focus, they go from the color purple to a 
grey/white color.
- Expected: Tabs in focus are white with black and bold font, tabs not in focus 
are black with white and bold font.

View toolbars:
These toolbars are a shade of grey/white while the rest of the UI is black.


View title:
If the View title is long, then the graphical "x" used to close the view can be 
cut off (most noticable in CDT with the "C/C++ Projects" view)
Comment 1 Debbie Wilson CLA 2004-03-11 12:35:45 EST
The section of this bug which relates to the view title causing the close 
button to disappear has been addressed in bug 53904.  I have added you to the 
cc list for this bug.
Comment 2 Kim Horne CLA 2004-04-15 09:52:36 EDT
MVM:  As long as we're using custom gradients on the tab folders, I don't see
how we can support high contrast mode... ideas?
Comment 3 Kim Horne CLA 2004-04-27 17:28:04 EDT
Fixed in HEAD.
Comment 4 Kim Horne CLA 2004-05-19 15:48:20 EDT
This is still broken, perhaps due to our recent colour definition changes.
Comment 5 Kim Horne CLA 2004-05-20 16:53:36 EDT
Closing this in favour of Bug 63220 which is more specific.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 63220 ***
Comment 6 Kim Horne CLA 2004-05-20 16:54:15 EDT
Closing