52441 – [Progress] Blocked UI dialog on startup

Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.

Bug 52441 - [Progress] Blocked UI dialog on startup

Summary: [Progress] Blocked UI dialog on startup

Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 52474

Alias:	None

Product:	Platform
Classification:	Eclipse Project
Component:	Resources (show other bugs)
Version:	3.0
Hardware:	Macintosh Mac OS X - Carbon (unsup.)

Importance:	P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone:	---
Assignee:	Platform-Resources-Inbox
QA Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2004-02-18 18:28 EST by Andre Weinand
Modified:	2004-02-24 14:12 EST (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Blocked UI dialog (116.49 KB, image/jpeg) 2004-02-18 18:29 EST, Andre Weinand	no flags	Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Andre Weinand

2004-02-18 18:28:35 EST

I20040218

On starting up Eclipse I got a Splash screen and a "User Interface is blocked" dialog, but no workspace 
window.

Comment 1 Andre Weinand

2004-02-18 18:29:09 EST

Created attachment 8007 [details]
Blocked UI dialog

Comment 2 Debbie Wilson

2004-02-19 10:28:03 EST

Don't know if this is Core or UI.  Please reassign if necessary.

Comment 3 Tod Creasey

2004-02-19 10:33:58 EST

Looks like a background build going on while an attempt to create the 
workbench is happening.

Andre did you have the java perspective as your focus perspective when you 
exited? If so it is likely the same issue as Bug 52474

Comment 4 John Arthorne

2004-02-19 12:04:18 EST

Andre, are you saying the workbench never came up?  Can you provide a stack dump?

Comment 5 Andre Weinand

2004-02-19 12:40:21 EST

Yes, the Java perspective was the focus perspective.
And I had autobuild on.

The workench window appeared after my workspace had been rebuilt (after 4 minutes or so).
So, I didn't saw a need for generating a thread dump.

Comment 6 John Arthorne

2004-02-19 13:56:38 EST

Ok, it does sound the same as bug 52474.

Comment 7 John Arthorne

2004-02-24 14:12:47 EST


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 52474 ***