Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 457204 - Text / font rendered in dialog unreadable
Summary: Text / font rendered in dialog unreadable
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 446075
Alias: None
Product: Platform
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: SWT (show other bugs)
Version: 4.5   Edit
Hardware: PC Linux
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Platform-SWT-Inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2015-01-11 06:23 EST by Frits Jalvingh CLA
Modified: 2015-01-13 03:31 EST (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments
Screenshot of the dialog (26.15 KB, image/png)
2015-01-11 06:23 EST, Frits Jalvingh CLA
no flags Details
Another one that looks "hazy" but is readable (18.93 KB, image/png)
2015-01-11 06:27 EST, Frits Jalvingh CLA
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Frits Jalvingh CLA 2015-01-11 06:23:38 EST
Created attachment 249845 [details]
Screenshot of the dialog

Eclipse Mars, M4, Build id: I20141210-2000 on Ubuntu 14.10 in dark theme.

Font in dialog (see example) is rendered wrong? This happens not all the time and not with all dialogs, but "Open Type" does it a lot.
Comment 1 Frits Jalvingh CLA 2015-01-11 06:27:19 EST
Created attachment 249846 [details]
Another one that looks "hazy" but is readable

When you use "Open Resource" and type a few letters then the initial dialog (showing lots of results) looks fine. But when you enter more text and the results fit on one page then it looks like the font changes to BOLD and it gets "hazy", like it's rendered multiple times at slightly different offsets.
Comment 2 Leo Ufimtsev CLA 2015-01-12 13:45:08 EST
Looks like duplicate of:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=446075
Comment 3 Arun Thondapu CLA 2015-01-13 03:31:19 EST
(In reply to Leo Ufimtsev from comment #2)
> Looks like duplicate of:
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=446075

Indeed, marking as dup.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 446075 ***