Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 443673 - Provide minimal runtime feature.
Summary: Provide minimal runtime feature.
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Efxclipse
Classification: Technology
Component: Runtime (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified   Edit
Hardware: All All
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: 1.1.0   Edit
Assignee: Project Inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: 442973
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2014-09-10 04:14 EDT by Alexander Nyßen CLA
Modified: 2014-09-26 09:44 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Screenshot showing missing feature names (94.17 KB, image/png)
2014-09-26 09:24 EDT, Alexander Nyßen CLA 		no flags Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Alexander Nyßen CLA 2014-09-10 04:14:27 EDT 
Currently, there is no runtime feature that only provides the minimal JavaFX requirements, i.e. that only bundles: 

- org.eclipse.fx.javafx
- org.eclipse.fx.osgi

It would be nice to have such a minimal runtime feature that could be referenced by all those clients that only want to use JavaFX (and no other parts of e(fx)clipse.

Maybe something like org.eclipse.fx.core.runtime could be an appropriate name for it?
Comment 1 Thomas Schindl CLA 2014-09-12 04:07:59 EDT 
fixed with http://git.eclipse.org/c/efxclipse/org.eclipse.efxclipse.git/commit/?id=01772e34db304f47148b74005bb55e651996bb31 - the shared-p2 repo (http://download.eclipse.org/efxclipse/runtime-shared-nightly/site) now has a feature named "org.eclipse.fx.runtime.min.feature" which only holds the 2 requested bundles
Comment 2 Alexander Nyßen CLA 2014-09-18 07:21:46 EDT 
Thanks very much, Tom. 

Could you publish the feature to Mars simrel build M2+0? This would allow me to directly refer to it when publishing the GEF bits as a +1.
Comment 3 Alexander Nyßen CLA 2014-09-26 09:24:56 EDT 
Created attachment 247394 [details]
Screenshot showing missing feature names

It seems the feature name is not set (or set to 'feature'). Looks a bit strange...
Comment 4 Thomas Schindl CLA 2014-09-26 09:44:27 EDT 
Ok please file a new bug for that so we can fix it.