Community
Participate
Working Groups
I suggest we allign the prefix of the example projects. I think it is easier for people looking for demos or examples if they all have the same prafix. I suggest to use "org.eclipse.ui.examples" as prefix. I think we should get rid of the differences betweeen "e4" and "old" examples and potentially update every example over time so that it uses the latest API. We currently have: org.eclipse.e4.demo.contacts.feature org.eclipse.e4.demo.contacts org.eclipse.e4.demo.cssbridge org.eclipse.e4.demo.e4photo org.eclipse.e4.examples.services org.eclipse.e4.ui.examples.css.rcp org.eclipse.e4.ui.examples.job org.eclipse.ui.examples.contributions org.eclipse.ui.examples.fieldassist org.eclipse.ui.examples.job org.eclipse.ui.examples.multipageeditor org.eclipse.ui.examples.navigator org.eclipse.ui.examples.propertysheet org.eclipse.ui.examples.rcp.browser org.eclipse.ui.examples.rcp.mail org.eclipse.ui.examples.readmetool org.eclipse.ui.examples.undo org.eclipse.ui.examples.views.properties.tabbed.article org.eclipse.ui.examples.views.properties.tabbed.hockeyleague org.eclipse.ui.examples.views.properties.tabbed.logic
I'm fine with setting a new standard that we can use, but I don't want to change any of the existing ones. Just like an already pushed commit on a branch, if we move it then any public links to it will be broken PW
I discussed that with Paul and we agreed that we can move the new projects: org.eclipse.e4.ui.examples.css.rcp org.eclipse.e4.ui.examples.job org.eclipse.e4.demo.cssbridge Also we think it is save to move this one, because it is not widely known / used. org.eclipse.e4.examples.services
(In reply to Lars Vogel from comment #2) > I discussed that with Paul and we agreed that we can move the new projects: > > org.eclipse.e4.ui.examples.css.rcp > org.eclipse.e4.ui.examples.job > org.eclipse.e4.demo.cssbridge > > Also we think it is save to move this one, because it is not widely known / > used. > > org.eclipse.e4.examples.services Daniel, Wojciech, is it ok for you if I rename/ move your projects?
It is OK for me.
(In reply to Wojciech Sudol from comment #4) > It is OK for me. We have already the "old" job example org.eclipse.ui.examples.job so I suggest to rename org.eclipse.e4.ui.examples.job to org.eclipse.ui.examples.job.e4 which still groups it correctly.
Agree.
org.eclipse.e4.examples.services -> org.eclipse.ui.examples.adapterservice https://git.eclipse.org/r/25424
Added a Readme.md to the readme example so remind me what this is for. https://git.eclipse.org/c/platform/eclipse.platform.ui.git/commit/?id=19f5a911e2a4fa682ee1b9915082db09169a57c8
(In reply to Lars Vogel from comment #7) > org.eclipse.e4.examples.services -> org.eclipse.ui.examples.adapterservice > > https://git.eclipse.org/r/25424 Merged with https://git.eclipse.org/c/platform/eclipse.platform.ui.git/commit/?id=44ee141dc83fc7ecc5b1906bc53b0dd2c02a7288
I mark this as fixed for M7. I might rework the other demos later or in Mars.
Verified in Git