Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 421867 - No HIPP for archived projects
Summary: No HIPP for archived projects
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Community
Classification: Eclipse Foundation
Component: CI-Jenkins (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified   Edit
Hardware: PC Linux
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: CI Admin Inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: 413102
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2013-11-15 15:40 EST by Wayne Beaton CLA
Modified: 2013-11-18 13:02 EST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Wayne Beaton CLA 2013-11-15 15:40:20 EST 
The list of projects in the "Hudson HIPP Control" list includes archived projects. These should probably be excluded.

The list also includes PolarSys and (I assume LocationTech) projects.
Comment 1 Wayne Beaton CLA 2013-11-15 15:41:43 EST 
I also notice that I have, as a PMC member, ability to control the Mylyn HIPP. I'm okay with PMC members being granted this option. Is it entended to other relations? e.g. can an Emeritus Committer control the instance?
Comment 2 Denis Roy CLA 2013-11-18 11:19:22 EST 
Indeed, I need to disable this for archived projects.

I'll check on the Committer Emeritus, but since a PMC member is linked to a project, I don't see any harm in showing them the HIPP control UI.
Comment 3 Denis Roy CLA 2013-11-18 11:37:46 EST 
Review is here:
https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/18510

This is a change in eclipse.org-common, so I will percolate it to the "master" eclipse.org-common on www.eclipse.org
Comment 4 Denis Roy CLA 2013-11-18 12:49:52 EST 
Thanks.  I've pushed the eclipse.org-common change to www.eclipse.org/eclipse.org-common

I have a "copy" of it on dev.eclipse.org since I need it there in the web root.  Seemed just as easy to simply put it in Git.
Comment 5 Wayne Beaton CLA 2013-11-18 13:02:40 EST 
(In reply to Denis Roy from comment #2)
> I'll check on the Committer Emeritus, but since a PMC member is linked to a
> project, I don't see any harm in showing them the HIPP control UI.

For completeness, my original question was more a concern that the query was matching anybody who had any sort of project relation.

Constraining it to PL and CM makes sense to me.

It also makes sense to me to include the PMC relations. It just occurred to me, however, that the PMC relationships is effectively a NOOP for subprojects. Querying for PMC relationships between the project and people will only identify top-level projects.