Community
Participate
Working Groups
Created attachment 228770 [details] patch.eclipse.platform.runtime.R4_2_maintenance To be applied right after I20130326-0800
Created attachment 228771 [details] patch.eclipse.platform.ua.R3_8_maintenance
Created attachment 228772 [details] patch.eclipse.platform.ui.R4_2_maintenance
Created attachment 228794 [details] patch.eclipse.platform.runtime.master
Created attachment 228795 [details] patch.eclipse.platform.ua.master
Created attachment 228796 [details] patch.eclipse.platform.ui.master
http://git.eclipse.org/c/platform/eclipse.platform.ui.git/commit/?id=f16e6cca7c0b742971503e50c5f1cdb6c84c02d9 http://git.eclipse.org/c/platform/eclipse.platform.ui.git/commit/?h=R4_2_maintenance&id=37d76ffd8277c4c2345bd8d6be048985dc661ed9 http://git.eclipse.org/c/platform/eclipse.platform.ua.git/commit/?id=4069ea9718102db6d035e7939ac9586e73fbbcef http://git.eclipse.org/c/platform/eclipse.platform.ua.git/commit/?h=R3_8_maintenance&id=404cb6b4a76fac4e0fb368086a824e92a0216a70 http://git.eclipse.org/c/platform/eclipse.platform.runtime.git/commit/?id=f7384dbdfaca23b79978109ac9681abf5400db30 http://git.eclipse.org/c/platform/eclipse.platform.runtime.git/commit/?h=R4_2_maintenance&id=7510e8c3fb1ae64d8439b7d2ec1e890f7c636a5b PW
@Paul- I noticed in some of the pom's you changed the header so that it is all on a single line. Is there a reason for this or is it just a formatting thing? http://git.eclipse.org/c/platform/eclipse.platform.ui.git/diff/tests/org.eclipse.e4.ui.tests/pom.xml?id=f16e6cca7c0b742971503e50c5f1cdb6c84c02d9 (Just curious is all, wasn't sure if having the header split between two lines could cause a parsing error or something) JD
I was using xsltproc for this, and the tool + its formatting did it. PW
Paul, shouldn't you also fix the parent pom for runtime and platform.ui in R3_8_maintenance? After all I've understood, it would make the 3.8.2+ build fail otherwise, no?
(In reply to comment #8) > I was using xsltproc for this, and the tool + its formatting did it. > > PW Cool beans, thanks
(In reply to comment #9) > Paul, shouldn't you also fix the parent pom for runtime and platform.ui in > R3_8_maintenance? After all I've understood, it would make the 3.8.2+ build > fail otherwise, no? We haven't done the 3.8.2+ branches yet (I haven't prepared the patches on it) but we're not building 3.8.2+ yet (I'm not sure that it has made it into LTS). I'll prepare the patches. PW
(In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #9) > > Paul, shouldn't you also fix the parent pom for runtime and platform.ui in > > R3_8_maintenance? After all I've understood, it would make the 3.8.2+ build > > fail otherwise, no? > > We haven't done the 3.8.2+ branches yet (I haven't prepared the patches on > it) but we're not building 3.8.2+ yet (I'm not sure that it has made it into > LTS). > > I'll prepare the patches Thanks! It's better to do this right now, then we won't have surprises when we need to do some emergency builds in the future. Especially, since some of the R3_8_maintenance repos have been updated.
Currently the CBI build breaks, looks like the pom changes for Eclipse 4.3 master are not completed. If I understood Paul, there are changes by other projects required. Do we have bugs for these changes?
(In reply to comment #13) > Currently the CBI build breaks, looks like the pom changes for Eclipse 4.3 > master are not completed. If I understood Paul, there are changes by other > projects required. Do we have bugs for these changes? Look at the "blocks" bug ;-)
Thanks Dani
Fixed in 3.8.2+ with: http://git.eclipse.org/c/platform/eclipse.platform.ui.git/commit/?h=R3_8_maintenance&id=b039be55127e2dcc089bb86ff2cf19ecaf70d1c8 http://git.eclipse.org/c/platform/eclipse.platform.runtime.git/commit/?h=R3_8_maintenance&id=82f206e099c31658aecf630e3ee5df37410c4a67 PW