Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 389377 - does performance machine not have access to "/shared" VM?
Summary: does performance machine not have access to "/shared" VM?
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Community
Classification: Eclipse Foundation
Component: CI-Jenkins (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified   Edit
Hardware: PC Linux
: P3 blocker (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: CI Admin Inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: 389369
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2012-09-12 03:14 EDT by David Williams CLA
Modified: 2012-09-12 10:10 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description David Williams CLA 2012-09-12 03:14:50 EDT 
Our unit tests explicitly use a VM from /shared/common, namely, 
/shared/common/sun-jdk1.6.0_21_x64/bin/java

But when I try to from the performance slave, it apparently can not "see" it? 

Error: JAVA_HOME is not defined correctly.
  We cannot execute /shared/common/sun-jdk1.6.0_21_x64/bin/java

If we can't access "shared" then 1) that'll be bad later on :) but 2) can I have the path of a 64 bit VM to use on that slave?

(We have to specify it several places in our scripts, so don't think we can use the built in "default" setting from Hudson Web UI (at least, not without some code re-write ... we'll need the path to it).
Comment 1 Denis Roy CLA 2012-09-12 10:10:16 EDT 
I've mounted /shared (/opt/public).