Community
Participate
Working Groups
AMP has declared intent to participate in the Juno release. The project has not yet submitted an IP log. The IP Log was due on May 23/2012. The review documentation is due tomorrow, June 6/2012. The IP Log must be processed by the IP team and the review documentation must be received for the project to undergo a review. If these materials are not received, the review will be cancelled and the project will be removed from Juno.
There have been no changes to the code base in that time aside from -- IIRC -- minor bug fixes by the current team. Nor is this a new release. We are merely releasing the already reviewed release as part of the Juno train. I assumed that was acceptable?
(In reply to comment #1) > There have been no changes to the code base in that time aside from -- IIRC -- > minor bug fixes by the current team. Nor is this a new release. We are merely > releasing the already reviewed release as part of the Juno train. I assumed > that was acceptable? So will this be a 0.9.1 release? i.e. a service release? If yes, can you update the project metadata to include a 0.9.1 release on 2012-06-27? You are correct that reviews are not required for service releases. Unfortunately, we don't have a good means of tracking projects that aren't doing a review.
Hi Wayne, Yep will do. I wasn't aware that we could increment or I would have done that. We'll drop a new build with the 0.9.1 versioning as well. Thanks for your understanding and clarifying.
Marking as INVALID since a review is not required.
