Community
Participate
Working Groups
This continues work started in bug 375976. While bug 375976 was fixed by defining variables needed for a couple more required BREE's, several point to "minimim 1.2" instead of the exactly correct 1.1 and 1.0. It'd be fairly easy to fix to be accurate. Assuming I can "get" the right fragments easily and simply put them in /shared/common/ area on build.eclipse.org. I'm guessing they don't change much, and I could use the literal plugin jars as they are, from 3.8 M6 build? (And, the actual link to that repo is broken, bug 376028, but that M6 "fragment repo" can be downloaded from http://www.eclipse.org/downloads/download.php?file=/eclipse/downloads/drops/S-3.8M6-201203141800/org.eclipse.pde.api.tools.ee.feature-3.8M6.zip
Tom, when you get a chance, if you confirm those M6 ones are the correct ones to use, I'll do the rest. Thanks,
(In reply to comment #0) > I'm guessing they don't change much, and I could use the literal plugin jars as > they are, from 3.8 M6 build? (And, the actual link to that repo is broken, bug > 376028, but that M6 "fragment repo" can be downloaded from The OSGi ee jars do not change often and if they do it is because of new version has been released. > > http://www.eclipse.org/downloads/download.php?file=/eclipse/downloads/drops/S-3.8M6-201203141800/org.eclipse.pde.api.tools.ee.feature-3.8M6.zip These are not actual class libraries that you can compile against. My understanding is that they provide some specific format that API tooling uses to verify API usage from a particular EE. So I do not think you can compile against them. There are a couple of CQs that contain the various osgi.minimum ee jars osgi min 1.1 - https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1450 osgi min 1.2 - https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2797 osgi min 1.2.1 - https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6312 Note that 1.2.1 is identical to 1.2 except it added generic signatures to the API as they are defined by a java 5 class library. I don't think we ever consumed the 1.0 version of the osgi ee jar. At least I did not find an CQ for it. So you could use the jar in https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1450 for osgi min 1.1. But I don't have anything approved for 1.0.
(In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #0) > These are not actual class libraries that you can compile against. I am glad I asked! > osgi min 1.1 - https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1450 > osgi min 1.2 - https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2797 > osgi min 1.2.1 - https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6312 > > So you could use the jar in > https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1450 for osgi min 1.1. But I > don't have anything approved for 1.0. Ok, I'll look into adding just this one (if not already there in /common/shared/ area) to be a little more accurate, and use it for both 1.1 and 1.0. Thanks for the education!
Before I forget, I better write down what I've learned/seen/done so far and some questions. There is/was a directory in /shared/common where these libraries were: $ ll /shared/common/org.eclipse.sdk-feature/libs/ total 2288K drwxr-s--- 2 root common 4K 2009-08-26 16:08 CVS/ -rw-r--r-- 1 root common 1035K 2009-08-25 15:36 ee.foundation-1.0.jar -rw-r--r-- 1 root common 627K 2009-08-25 15:36 ee.foundation.jar -rw-r--r-- 1 root common 601K 2009-08-25 15:36 ee.minimum-1.2.0.jar -rw-r--r-- 1 root common 1K 2009-08-25 15:57 readme.txt The directory was owned by root, so I had to created a new one (for now) to add the new ee jar: $ ll /shared/common/org.eclipse.sdk-feature2/libs/ total 2676K drwxr-s--- 2 david_williams common 4K 2012-04-04 21:51 CVS/ -rw-r--r-- 1 david_williams common 1035K 2012-04-04 21:51 ee.foundation-1.0.jar -rw-r--r-- 1 david_williams common 627K 2012-04-04 21:51 ee.foundation.jar -rw-r--r-- 1 david_williams common 601K 2012-04-04 21:51 ee.minimum-1.2.0.jar -rw-rw-r-- 1 david_williams common 382K 2012-04-04 21:52 ee.minimum.jar -rw-r--r-- 1 david_williams common 1K 2012-04-04 21:59 readme.txt And naturally, I updated the readme.txt there: $ cat /shared/common/org.eclipse.sdk-feature2/libs/readme.txt These files are copied from the org.eclipse.osgi/osgi project for use compiling eclipse on build.eclipse.org ee.foundation-1.0.jar is the 1.4 cvs version from org.eclipse.osgi/osgi = CDC-1.1/Foundation-1.0 ee.foundation.jar = CDC-1.1/Foundation-1.1 ee.minimum-1.2.0.jar = OSGi/Minimum-1.2 # ee.minimum.jar taken from CQ 1450 see bug 376029 # current used for both # -DOSGi/Minimum-1.0= ... \ # -DOSGi/Minimum-1.1= ... \ ee.minimum.jar = osgi min 1.1 (technically 1.1.3) Now, the question. You can see from directory listings, these originally came from a cvs repository. From peeking in there, I can see the cvs repository was /cvsroot/eclipse/org.eclipse.sdk-feature. The readme implies they came from org.eclipse.osgi/osgi? (I've not checked). So ... question is, is there a 'git' counterpart? Should I put these in git to better ensure the build environment is reproducible? More minor question, does anyone know if anyone else were using these? Not sure if I should "leave as is" or ask webmasters to update /shared/common/org.eclipse.sdk-feature/libs/ perhaps they were owned by root specifically to prevent tampering? Oh, and I am using the org.eclipse.sdk-feature2 versions in builds now ... and haven't noticed any problems or compile errors with the new minimum.
(In reply to comment #4) > Before I forget, I better write down what I've learned/seen/done so far and > some questions. > > There is/was a directory in /shared/common where these libraries were: > > $ ll /shared/common/org.eclipse.sdk-feature/libs/ > total 2288K > drwxr-s--- 2 root common 4K 2009-08-26 16:08 CVS/ > -rw-r--r-- 1 root common 1035K 2009-08-25 15:36 ee.foundation-1.0.jar > -rw-r--r-- 1 root common 627K 2009-08-25 15:36 ee.foundation.jar > -rw-r--r-- 1 root common 601K 2009-08-25 15:36 ee.minimum-1.2.0.jar > -rw-r--r-- 1 root common 1K 2009-08-25 15:57 readme.txt > > The directory was owned by root, so I had to created a new one (for now) to add > the new ee jar: > > $ ll /shared/common/org.eclipse.sdk-feature2/libs/ > total 2676K > drwxr-s--- 2 david_williams common 4K 2012-04-04 21:51 CVS/ > -rw-r--r-- 1 david_williams common 1035K 2012-04-04 21:51 ee.foundation-1.0.jar > -rw-r--r-- 1 david_williams common 627K 2012-04-04 21:51 ee.foundation.jar > -rw-r--r-- 1 david_williams common 601K 2012-04-04 21:51 ee.minimum-1.2.0.jar > -rw-rw-r-- 1 david_williams common 382K 2012-04-04 21:52 ee.minimum.jar > -rw-r--r-- 1 david_williams common 1K 2012-04-04 21:59 readme.txt > > And naturally, I updated the readme.txt there: > > $ cat /shared/common/org.eclipse.sdk-feature2/libs/readme.txt > These files are copied from the org.eclipse.osgi/osgi project for use compiling > eclipse on build.eclipse.org > > ee.foundation-1.0.jar is the 1.4 cvs version from org.eclipse.osgi/osgi = > CDC-1.1/Foundation-1.0 > ee.foundation.jar = CDC-1.1/Foundation-1.1 > ee.minimum-1.2.0.jar = OSGi/Minimum-1.2 > # ee.minimum.jar taken from CQ 1450 see bug 376029 > # current used for both > # -DOSGi/Minimum-1.0= ... \ > # -DOSGi/Minimum-1.1= ... \ > ee.minimum.jar = osgi min 1.1 (technically 1.1.3) > > Now, the question. You can see from directory listings, these originally came > from a cvs repository. From peeking in there, I can see the cvs repository was > /cvsroot/eclipse/org.eclipse.sdk-feature. The readme implies they came from > org.eclipse.osgi/osgi? (I've not checked). > > So ... question is, is there a 'git' counterpart? Should I put these in git to > better ensure the build environment is reproducible? org.eclipse.osgi does contain these jars, but to be honest I have been wanting to move these ee definitions and jars out of org.eclipse.osgi for a while. Perhaps we should get a new project in rt.equinox.framework to house these files? Perhaps in a org.eclipse.equinox.releng.ees at: http://git.eclipse.org/c/equinox/rt.equinox.framework.git/tree/releng > > More minor question, does anyone know if anyone else were using these? Not sure > if I should "leave as is" or ask webmasters to update > /shared/common/org.eclipse.sdk-feature/libs/ > perhaps they were owned by root specifically to prevent tampering? I do not know. I suspect most projects have moved on since these are really old ee and only really interesting to Java ME developers. The only ee that has potential interest is the osgi.ee 1.2.1 since it added generics to the osgi.ee 1.2 class library. This allows projects to use jsr14 + oegi.ee(1.2.1) + (generics in there code/API) and still be able to run on J2SE-1.4 base VMs. Of coarse it has since been noted that such generified API will not be recognized by the Sun/Oracle java compiler (bug 369145). > > Oh, and I am using the org.eclipse.sdk-feature2 versions in builds now ... and > haven't noticed any problems or compile errors with the new minimum. Great!
I think everything to do here has been "fixed" some time ago (assuming M7). Let me know if I've misunderstood anything.
