Community
Participate
Working Groups
John J. Barton said: "Having a huge blank space in the middle, separating the buttons for an item from the name of the item is not usable. One has to exert a lot of mental effort to imagine a line all the way across the page to line up the buttons with the repo. The problem with previous soln was the repeated repeated layers of twisties and the missing link to navigation. The previous soln did have white space, but it was all where it belonged, on the RHS and bottom. The main point about the white space is simple: there is space for more critical links like direct navigation." Something to think about. I talked with Anton about that and he will look at the issue.
Linda is still going to look at this as well, once we have basic toolbar and slideout visuals defined. The work is tracked in bug 360986.
also, Szymon's stripes on the page should help
Created attachment 210085 [details] screenshot of sites page just happened to have a site page open, this is another approach
Here is John's screensnap from original bug. https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/attachment.cgi?id=210025 So in the sites case we make the content only as wide as needed. In the nav case we use some min/max widths for some of the columns. The answer here is probably to use some max width for the repo columns and let the buttons sit adjacent. You could use a min width too if you want to prevent it being too dorky looking. Then the question becomes...what about the section headers? Do the align right on the browser or do we try to align them with the interior buttons. This is the part Linda is playing with in the mockups.
Please push this fix ... https://github.com/antonmc/orion.client/commit/3156bb30e9f514ee3d80c433af71479bc1f91871 Anton
The fix was pushed to .4M2. Should we consider the bug fixed?
Created attachment 210395 [details] Screenshot of 0.4M2 git-repository page The current UI requires 1000px. If the .setting min-width is removed and the repositoryActionsArea is placed after the title rather than a separate div, then the narrower UI will, I believe, work well enough. (In addition repositoryActionsArea should be a CSS class rather than an id, it appears once per repo).
(In reply to comment #7) > Created attachment 210395 [details] > Screenshot of 0.4M2 git-repository page > > The current UI requires 1000px. If the .setting min-width is removed and the > repositoryActionsArea is placed after the title rather than a separate div, > then the narrower UI will, I believe, work well enough. (In addition > repositoryActionsArea should be a CSS class rather than an id, it appears once > per repo). This was basically the issue I had in bug 370280. The page still doesn't need to clip as aggressively as it does but I was okay for 0.4 since we were under ipad width. Reassigning to Szymon for future work and looking into your suggestions above.
Anthony and Anton, I would like to continue this discussion and have agreement during 4.0M1. What are your suggestions here?
Created attachment 233083 [details] Example Screen Shot I get no horizontal scrollbar until around 830px wide, rather than 1000px like before. I do agree there is a huge space in the middle and on both the left and right that are not necessary and should be reduced before a scrollbar shows up. I have attached a screen shot.
This was about the old Git pages.
