Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 367466 - [pmi] PMC needs to be able to undo an election veto, or resurrect an expired nomination.
Summary: [pmi] PMC needs to be able to undo an election veto, or resurrect an expired ...
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Community
Classification: Eclipse Foundation
Component: Project Management & Portal (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified   Edit
Hardware: PC Linux
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Eric Poirier CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard: stalebug
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-12-22 20:39 EST by Wayne Beaton CLA
Modified: 2019-07-17 11:50 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Wayne Beaton CLA 2011-12-22 20:39:01 EST 
The PMC gets the final approval on committer elections. Infrequently, it is the act of vetoing an election that draws out missing information that might change the desired result to approval. Also, approved nomination oftentimes run out because the committer is late with paperwork or other reasons. In these cases, a PMC member should be able to resurrect the existing nomination/election results rather than requiring that a new election be run.
Comment 1 Eclipse Genie CLA 2015-02-24 12:15:42 EST 
This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet.

If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant.

--
The automated Eclipse Genie.
Comment 2 Eclipse Genie CLA 2017-02-15 16:41:51 EST 
This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet.

If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant.

--
The automated Eclipse Genie.
Comment 3 Eclipse Genie CLA 2019-02-06 01:20:21 EST 
This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet.

If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant.

--
The automated Eclipse Genie.
Comment 4 Eric Poirier CLA 2019-07-17 11:33:57 EDT 
Hi Wayne,

Does this still needs to be implemented in the current version of the PMI?

Thanks.
Comment 5 Wayne Beaton CLA 2019-07-17 11:50:05 EDT 
This is a very low priority "nice to have". In practice, we haven't actually needed it. So let's just make it WONTFIX.