Community
Participate
Working Groups
Sometimes when Eclipse starts I have a ConcurrentModificationException during "Initializing Java Tooling". Today it happened with the following stack trace: eclipse.buildId=M20110909-1335 java.version=1.6.0_26 java.vendor=Sun Microsystems Inc. BootLoader constants: OS=win32, ARCH=x86_64, WS=win32, NL=it_IT Command-line arguments: -os win32 -ws win32 -arch x86_64 -debug -consoleLog -data d:\workspace37-Trunk Error Thu Dec 22 17:15:23 CET 2011 An internal error occurred during: "Initializing Java Tooling". java.util.ConcurrentModificationException at java.util.HashMap$HashIterator.nextEntry(Unknown Source) at java.util.HashMap$EntryIterator.next(Unknown Source) at java.util.HashMap$EntryIterator.next(Unknown Source) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.core.JavaModelManager$9.run(JavaModelManager.java:2796) at org.eclipse.core.internal.resources.Workspace.run(Workspace.java:2344) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.core.JavaModelManager.initializeAllContainers(JavaModelManager.java:2816) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.core.JavaModelManager.getClasspathContainer(JavaModelManager.java:1873) at org.eclipse.jdt.core.JavaCore.initializeAfterLoad(JavaCore.java:3556) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.ui.InitializeAfterLoadJob$RealJob.run(InitializeAfterLoadJob.java:36) at org.eclipse.core.internal.jobs.Worker.run(Worker.java:54)
This is fixed in 3.8 via bug 351498. Please try one of the recent 3.8 builds. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 351498 ***
Are you sure bug 351498 is the same? Its stack trace is totally different and its target milestone is 3.7.1. However, I'm actually seeing my exception in 3.7.1.
Satyam, looks like this one is yet to be released in 3.7.x, doesn't it?
(In reply to comment #3) > Satyam, looks like this one is yet to be released in 3.7.x, doesn't it? Bug 351498 was released into the BETA_JAVA7 branch, which then become 3.7.1, right?
(In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > Satyam, looks like this one is yet to be released in 3.7.x, doesn't it? > > Bug 351498 was released into the BETA_JAVA7 branch, which then > become 3.7.1, right? Sorry, I didn't notice that. Yes, it should have been fixed in 3.7.1.
The problem is different. Hence, reopening.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 327717 ***