Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 366793 - SWT: Alignment of elements in TabBoxes / GroupBoxes
Summary: SWT: Alignment of elements in TabBoxes / GroupBoxes
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: z_Archived
Classification: Eclipse Foundation
Component: Scout (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows 7
: P5 minor (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Project Inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-12-15 04:47 EST by Christoph Thommen CLA
Modified: 2021-08-19 11:23 EDT (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments
SWT UI (5.17 KB, image/png)
2011-12-15 04:47 EST, Christoph Thommen CLA 		no flags Details
Swing UI (4.51 KB, image/png)
2011-12-15 04:47 EST, Christoph Thommen CLA 		no flags Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Christoph Thommen CLA 2011-12-15 04:47:36 EST 
Created attachment 208427 [details]
SWT UI

If a form contains a GroupBox and a TabBox, the elements in those boxes are not aligned the same way (in SWT UI). In Swing they are.

See example attached.
Comment 1 Christoph Thommen CLA 2011-12-15 04:47:53 EST 
Created attachment 208428 [details]
Swing UI
Comment 2 Matthias Zimmermann CLA 2012-02-29 09:25:26 EST 
priority updated from p3 to p5, severety changed to minor
Comment 3 Andreas Hoegger CLA 2015-04-14 10:13:19 EDT 
Scout Project clean up.
Bugs matching one of the following criteria will be removed:
- SWT, Swing and HTML(RAP) bugs which are not mandatory for the next release. The future is the new HTML UI.
- Bugs concerning a replaced technology.
- old bugs which got obsolete.
Comment 4 Matthias Zimmermann CLA 2015-07-06 08:24:29 EDT 
bugzilla cleanup for bugs in state WONTFIX, INVALID and WORSFORME and no target milestone.

in case the bug should have been closed by mistake, please reopen the bug and let us know why you think that this bug should not have been closed.