Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 365895 - [All diagrams] Stereotypes applications on elements are not always dispayed samely
Summary: [All diagrams] Stereotypes applications on elements are not always dispayed s...
Status: ASSIGNED
Alias: None
Product: Papyrus
Classification: Modeling
Component: Diagram (show other bugs)
Version: 0.10.0   Edit
Hardware: All All
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Remi Schnekenburger CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-12-07 08:48 EST by JBregnias CLA
Modified: 2013-03-13 11:28 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description JBregnias CLA 2011-12-07 08:48:16 EST
Stereotypes applications on elements are not always dispayed by the right representation depending on the way to apply it. 
Example : in a BDD, create a Unit element from the palette, and create an InstanceSpecification and then apply the "Unit" stereotype, the two elements are a Unit Element, but are not displayed with the same representation.
Comment 1 Camille Letavernier CLA 2013-03-13 11:28:05 EDT
The problem is that the Edit Part used for Unit is not the same as the one used for InstanceSpecification. It is not the same graphical element.

There is no way to switch from an InstanceSpecification edit part to a Unit edit part (And vice versa, when you create a Unit and remove the Unit stereotype)