Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 364651 - [completeocl] Support serialization to Complete OCL
Summary: [completeocl] Support serialization to Complete OCL
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 500551
Alias: None
Product: OCL
Classification: Modeling
Component: Core (show other bugs)
Version: 3.2.0   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows Vista
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: OCL Inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-11-23 15:57 EST by Ed Willink CLA
Modified: 2017-12-01 12:38 EST (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Ed Willink CLA 2011-11-23 15:57:07 EST
Maintenance of the UML specification requires an ability to partition a composite model+constraints meta-model into separate model + constraints models with the constraints expressed in CompleteOCL.

Therefore provide a CompleteOCL splitter to partition a pivot resource into two, and implement the missing Pivot2CompleteOCL serializer.
Comment 1 Ed Willink CLA 2012-01-04 16:22:12 EST
A splitter is now present in the build plugin for UML usage. Still needs sensible integration into editor save/load actions.
Comment 2 Faiez Za CLA 2012-11-20 03:51:33 EST
Can you explain how we can serialize an CompleteOCL document please?
I have a CompleteOCL document which import an ecore and I 'd like just serialize the CompleteOCL document and generate the xmi file.

Best regards,
Fy Za.
Comment 3 Ed Willink CLA 2012-11-20 09:14:52 EST
(In reply to comment #2)
> Can you explain how we can serialize an CompleteOCL document please?
> I have a CompleteOCL document which import an ecore and I 'd like just
> serialize the CompleteOCL document and generate the xmi file.

This Bugzilla is a bout serializing the OCL part of an embedded OCL model as Complete OCL text. It has nothing to do with serializing to XMI. Please use the newsgroup for questions for which there is no reason to believe a bug fix or enhacement request is applicable.
Comment 4 Ed Willink CLA 2017-12-01 12:38:19 EST

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 500551 ***