Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 364637 - Allow not participants to write anomalies (formal reviews)
Summary: Allow not participants to write anomalies (formal reviews)
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: z_Archived
Classification: Eclipse Foundation
Component: Mylyn (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows Vista
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: 0.9   Edit
Assignee: Sebastien Dubois CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 364598 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-11-23 13:46 EST by Alvaro Sanchez-Leon CLA
Modified: 2012-02-27 10:53 EST (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Alvaro Sanchez-Leon CLA 2011-11-23 13:46:08 EST 
In basic and formal reviews, it's is possible by anybody with access to the review group to write anomalies, 
if this user was not part of the review, he/she gets automatically added to the review.
 
 However for informal reviews. creation of anomalies is restricted to pre-selected participants.
 there is really no reason to prevent this as the person can add him/her self at any time.
 
Automatic addition of participant will simplify the process of participation for formal reviews, with no sacrifice on functionality.
Comment 1 Alvaro Sanchez-Leon CLA 2011-11-23 13:47:48 EST 
correction:
Second paragraph should start like:

	However for formal reviews.
Comment 2 Sebastien Dubois CLA 2012-01-06 11:12:04 EST 
Now anybody can add anomalies for all review types.  If they are not part of the review, they will be added as participants.  However, for formal reviews only Lead, Organizer and Author can add review items.  This will have to be discussed.

Also, I fixed another bug where it was not possible to add review items/anomalies from the outline view
Comment 3 Sebastien Dubois CLA 2012-01-16 16:11:52 EST 
Fix implemented and merged in
Comment 4 Jacques Bouthillier CLA 2012-02-27 10:53:08 EST 
*** Bug 364598 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***