Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 364250 - GridLayout in a newly created widget displays as a small box in Eclipse 3.7, default rendering engine
Summary: GridLayout in a newly created widget displays as a small box in Eclipse 3.7, ...
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: z_Archived
Classification: Eclipse Foundation
Component: EDT (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P1 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Huo Zhen Zhong CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-11-20 22:08 EST by Thomas Wu CLA
Modified: 2017-02-23 14:19 EST (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments
Newly widget shown in Eclipse 3.7 default render engine (160.93 KB, image/pjpeg)
2011-11-20 22:11 EST, Thomas Wu CLA
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Thomas Wu CLA 2011-11-20 22:08:57 EST
Build Identifier: 20111120

This should be a regression because there is no issue in build of 20111113.
In EDT on Eclipse 3.7, use default rendering engine in VE appearance. The default GridLayout in a newly created widget will display as a small box.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Install EDT on Eclipse 3.7, use the default rendering engine in VE appearance. 
2.New a widget.

Actual results: The default GridLayout in a newly created widget will display as a small box. User could only DD other widgets into such small box.
Additional info: It works fine if user chooses IE as the VE render engine.
Comment 1 Thomas Wu CLA 2011-11-20 22:11:36 EST
Created attachment 207282 [details]
Newly widget shown in Eclipse 3.7 default render engine
Comment 2 Huo Zhen Zhong CLA 2011-11-21 01:10:59 EST
This problem only occurs on WebKit
Comment 3 Huo Zhen Zhong CLA 2011-11-21 01:33:34 EST
Hi, Brian

This can be indirect fix by the last fix (fix for button) for 360918, which is waiting for your review, please review it asap, then I can check in the code.
Comment 4 Brian Svihovec CLA 2011-11-21 08:30:45 EST
I believe this should be marked as a duplicate of 360918.
Comment 5 Huo Zhen Zhong CLA 2011-11-21 22:00:36 EST
This is a regression defect and has indirect fixed by the last fix (fix for button) for 360918.
Comment 6 Thomas Wu CLA 2011-11-22 21:15:59 EST
Verified in build 20111122