Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 363650 - Integration of Graphiti in Amalgam not up to date
Summary: Integration of Graphiti in Amalgam not up to date
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Amalgam
Classification: Modeling
Component: UI (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows 7
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Project Inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on: 330245
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2011-11-12 13:57 EST by jukefox CLA
Modified: 2013-05-30 08:59 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description jukefox CLA 2011-11-12 13:57:01 EST 
Build Identifier: M20110909-1335

The Graphiti integration has a bug: An installation is not possible due to a wrong update site. The correct update site also depends on the version of Eclipse. So please update the sites with every new release.

For Indigo the new update site is "http://download.eclipse.org/graphiti/updates/0.8.1" or simply use "http://download.eclipse.org/releases/indigo".

Who has to care about these changes? Obviously no one tested it with the
Indigo-release.


Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open the discover dialog.
2. Click on the Graphiti-entry and get the error when it comes to the update site call.
Comment 1 Cedric Brun CLA 2013-05-28 12:18:30 EDT 
The problem was still here for indigo, juno and kepler, I fixed it for all three.

In the meantime I removed the "early versions" message which is no more relevant.

The graphiti team has to care for these change and make sure its installable - or ask be removed from the modeling discovery if they don't care about it.

Anyway thanks for your report and sorry for the delay, this bug got definitely lost for some reasons.
Comment 2 Cedric Brun CLA 2013-05-28 12:19:26 EDT 
"this bug got definitely lost for some reasons." I meant : "for no reason"
Comment 3 jukefox CLA 2013-05-30 08:59:16 EDT 
Hehe:-)
Thanks. As soon as a problem like this one occurs again I will post a ticket in the Papyrus project.