Community
Participate
Working Groups
Check out the following project from kan-cvs-save /cvsroot/rbd check out project egl.rest from module org.eclipse.edt.tests.services right click on the project (or egl packages, or egl files), Generate EGL Test driver => javaScript Async you will see the driver project egl.rest.javascript.async run rui handler under eunitgen.libraries.async TestPrimitives_rui.egl after it finishes running, refresh project egl.rest.javascript.async, you should see a folder called ResultRoot, open the result summary file, you can see there are 40 tests, 27 passed, 11 has errors, 2 has failures. Please look at the timestamp and date tests ==> timestamp_in test, I get the following service exception TestPrimitives_DEDICATED_BINDING::testTimestamp_inParm: ERROR - Caught service exception: EGL0023E: An error occurred while trying to invoke function:{"method":"timestamp_inParm","params":["Cannot toJSONString Tue Feb 15 2005 12:30:11 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time)]} on EGL Service:services.PrimitivePassing. detail1: detail2: detail3:org.eclipse.edt.javart.json.TokenMgrError:Lexical error at line 1, column 120. Encountered: <EOF> after : "\"Cannot toJSONString Tue Feb 15 2005 12:30:11 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time)]}" ==> date_in test, I get the following service exception TestPrimitives_DEDICATED_BINDING::testDate_inParm: ERROR - Caught service exception: EGL0023E: An error occurred while trying to invoke function:{"method":"date_inParam","params":["Cannot toJSONString Tue Mar 02 2010 00:00:00 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time)]} on EGL Service:services.PrimitivePassing. detail1: detail2: detail3:org.eclipse.edt.javart.json.TokenMgrError:Lexical error at line 1, column 116. Encountered: <EOF> after : "\"Cannot toJSONString Tue Mar 02 2010 00:00:00 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time)]}"
fixed Primitives: reason: test case: 40; all passed
I tried to verify this using 2011/11/11/0901's build, find the timestamp inout and timestamp out are failing (it was successful 2 days ago) so I think they're caused by javascripg gen regression. Please take a look
this is the error of in javascript [CRRUI1070E] An [CRRUI2002E] testTimestamp_inoutParm An error occurred inside TestPrimitives: date.getMilliseconds is not a function exception occurred while processing the call back function. Use the try...OnException. [CRRUI2002E] testTimestamp_inoutParm An error occurred inside TestPrimitives: date.getMilliseconds is not a function [CRRUI2094E] Here are the EGL function calls leading to this error: libraries/async/TestPrimitives.egl() at line 29 libraries/async/TestPrimitives.egl() at line 200 org/eclipse/edt/eunit/runtime/TestListMgr.egl() at line 42 libraries/async/TestPrimitives.egl() at line 628 RUI Runtime.Handling callback for services.PrimitivePassing() [native JavaScript] RUI Runtime.Response for services.PrimitivePassing() [native JavaScript] Running test: TestPrimitives_DEDICATED_BINDING::testTimestamp_inoutParm [CRRUI1072E] An [CRRUI2002E] testTimestamp_outParm An error occurred inside TestPrimitives: date.getMilliseconds is not a function exception occurred in the error call back function, code with try...OnException [CRRUI2002E] testTimestamp_outParm An error occurred inside TestPrimitives: date.getMilliseconds is not a function [CRRUI2094E] Here are the EGL function calls leading to this error: libraries/async/TestPrimitives.egl() at line 29 libraries/async/TestPrimitives.egl() at line 207 org/eclipse/edt/eunit/runtime/TestListMgr.egl() at line 42 org/eclipse/edt/eunit/runtime/TestListMgr.egl() at line 86 libraries/async/TestPrimitives.egl() at line 33 Running test: TestPrimitives_DEDICATED_BINDING::testTimestamp_outParm [CRRUI1072E] An [CRRUI2002E] testTimestamp_allParm
mark as major, since this is a regression
Hi Jing, The new problem is caused by the type inconsistency. The service function parameter type is timestamp function timestamp_inoutparm (p timestamp inout) p = "2005/02/15-12:35:11"; end But when calling the service the parameter type is timestamp("yyyyMMddHHmmss") timestamp1 timestamp("yyyyMMddHHmmss") = "19990101010101"; call getPrimitiveService().timestamp_inoutParm(timestamp1) returning to verifyTimestamp_inoutParm onException handleServiceException; If you try such case in a handler by direct function call, it may produce compile error. Sample code: function start() timestamp1 timestamp("yyyyMMddHHmmss") = "19990101010101"; timestamp_inoutparm(timestamp1); end function timestamp_inoutparm (p timestamp inout) p = "2005/02/15-12:35:11"; end So I wondering if the test case is valid. If it is invalid, we may have to add validation for such case.
verified with 201111160901's build. modified the test case, changed the parameter to value type Now, all services tests runs 100% successful Opened Bug# 363919 for the validation need
