Community
Participate
Working Groups
Build Identifier: 20110916-0149 I have a Constraint block (CB1) that has Properties and Constraint Properties. I create other Constraint Block (CB2) that is composed by the first constraint block that I created before (CB1). In consequence, the CB1 instance is a property of CB2. If I say that CB1 constrains CB2, that means the CB1 instance is a ConstraintProperty of CB2. If CB1 instance is a ConstraintProperty on CB2, so CB1 is not a "normal" property, in other words, it is a "parameter". If I correct with my reasoning, when I draw CB2 in a Parametrics Diagram, the CB1 instance is not drawing, only the parameters defined for CB2. In Papyrus, CB1 instance is drawing. I hope I am clear Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Create three ConstraintBlocks (CB1, CB2 and CB3). 2. Create a Directed Composition assotiation between them (CB1->CB2->CB3). 3. Add ConstraintProperty stereotype to the property derivaded from the association(CB3 and CB2 instance). 4. Create a Parametrics Diagram for CB1 5. Drag CB2 instance to Parametrics Diagram 6. CB3 appears as a "normal" property (parameter) and it has to be hidden
Parametric diagrams are not supported under Kepler M5.
(In reply to comment #1) > Parametric diagrams are not supported under Kepler M5. Hi Arnaud, But if I understand well, in the next Eclipse release (Kepler), parametric diagram should be available again according to this answer in the papyrus forum: http://www.eclipse.org/forums/index.php/m/902739/?srch=sysml#msg_902739 If it is true, the problem continues, isn't it?
Parametric diagram editor is about to be redesigned from scratch. I closed as invalid every old tasks open again previous version.
