Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 355836 - Two CLOSED/FIXED bugs marked iplog+ are not appear in the Jubula IP Log
Summary: Two CLOSED/FIXED bugs marked iplog+ are not appear in the Jubula IP Log
Status: CLOSED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: Community
Classification: Eclipse Foundation
Component: IP Log Tool (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified   Edit
Hardware: PC Linux
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Wayne Beaton CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-08-25 09:53 EDT by Wayne Beaton CLA
Modified: 2014-04-04 15:06 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Wayne Beaton CLA 2011-08-25 09:53:35 EDT 
Two CLOSED/FIXED bugs marked iplog+ are not appearing in the Jubula project's auto-generated IP Log.

Jubula 335565 Monitoring-Reports can unnecessarily overfill the database
* 187729: new version of previous patch [iplog+] (PATCH) 2011.01.27
Jubula 335671 Enhance the tooltip and decorator mechanism for external usage
* 187840: patch which contains the enhancement v2 (now with the missing package) [iplog+] (PATCH) 2011.01.28

It appears as though the project is doing everything right. The attachments--contributed by a non-committer--are correctly marked and the bug is CLOSED.

Could it be the CLOSED status (rather than RESOLVED) that's causing the IP Log generator to miss these bugs?
Comment 1 Achim Loerke CLA 2011-08-25 10:14:23 EDT 
Would it be helpful to change the status of one of this bugs to resolved? Just as a test because we like our bugs closed :-)
Comment 2 Wayne Beaton CLA 2011-08-25 11:07:47 EDT 
It looks like both of these attachments have been explicitly excluded using the IP Log tool?

Any idea why? They look like contributions that should be tracked to me (and it'd be just as easy to simply remove the iplog+ flag if they're not).
Comment 3 Achim Loerke CLA 2011-08-25 11:13:27 EDT 
(In reply to comment #2)
> It looks like both of these attachments have been explicitly excluded using the
> IP Log tool?
> 
> Any idea why? 

Yes, my bad. I thought this were contributions to the 3.7 release without checking the titles. I have included them back into the log,

Sorry for the extra work.
Comment 4 Wayne Beaton CLA 2014-04-04 15:06:33 EDT 
I think WORKSFORME is the most appropriate way to close this.