Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 354447 - Platform Runtime Git repository seems to have a bad .gitignore
Summary: Platform Runtime Git repository seems to have a bad .gitignore
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Platform
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: Runtime (show other bugs)
Version: 4.1   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: platform-runtime-inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on: 354429
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2011-08-10 18:27 EDT by Paul Webster CLA
Modified: 2011-08-15 17:32 EDT (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Paul Webster CLA 2011-08-10 18:27:10 EDT
The .gitignore should be updated for R3_7_maintenance, and ideally R3_6_maintenance, R3_5_maintenance, and R3_4_maintenance

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #354429 +++

My new Java files for the tests/org.eclipse.e4.core.tests/ bundle does not appear to be showing up. It does not get the '?' decorator in Eclipse and 'git status' on the command line gives me nothing. The project root works and the src/ folder works though.
Comment 1 Paul Webster CLA 2011-08-11 19:19:27 EDT
Remy, Oleg can help with this one.

Later,
PW
Comment 2 Oleg Besedin CLA 2011-08-12 09:53:07 EDT
John, we noticed that you made the change in master (bug 354429 comment 7). Do you think we need the same change in the maintenance branches? (And could you do it if so ? :-))
Comment 3 Remy Suen CLA 2011-08-12 10:14:24 EDT
I also noticed I deleted the 'core.*' from the UI repositories too (whereas John only deleted the 'core' entry). I don't think this actually matters.

Well, I hope anyway...
Comment 4 Paul Webster CLA 2011-08-12 10:39:32 EDT
Please put the core.* back ... that's the JVM cores.

PW
Comment 5 Remy Suen CLA 2011-08-12 10:41:46 EDT
(In reply to comment #4)
> Please put the core.* back ... that's the JVM cores.

Oh, so that's what they're for...
Comment 6 John Arthorne CLA 2011-08-15 17:32:03 EDT
I have made the change in 3.7, 3.6, and 3.5 maintenance. A good opportunity to practice cherry-pick...