Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 351993 - [dstore] not able to connect to server if .eclipse folder not available
Summary: [dstore] not able to connect to server if .eclipse folder not available
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Target Management
Classification: Tools
Component: RSE (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified   Edit
Hardware: PC All
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: 3.3.1   Edit
Assignee: David McKnight CLA
QA Contact: Martin Oberhuber CLA
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: 352159
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2011-07-13 11:28 EDT by Li Ding CLA
Modified: 2011-07-18 11:35 EDT (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
dmcknigh: review? (xuanchen)

Attachments
patch to handle case of inaccessible server log dir (6.29 KB, patch)
2011-07-13 12:40 EDT, David McKnight CLA 		no flags Details | Diff
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Li Ding CLA 2011-07-13 11:28:37 EDT 
When I tried to connect to a daemon running on AIX I got error saying like "no such folder". It complained that .eclipse folder was not available. It turns out my new id does not have authority to create a folder on the server.

However I think RSE should be able to handle this case by disabling functions which need .eclipse folder.
Comment 1 David McKnight CLA 2011-07-13 12:40:33 EDT 
Created attachment 199608 [details]
patch to handle case of inaccessible server log dir
Comment 2 David McKnight CLA 2011-07-13 12:40:56 EDT 
Xuan, could you please review this path?
Comment 3 David McKnight CLA 2011-07-13 12:41:28 EDT 
Li, does this need to be backported to RSE 3.2.x?
Comment 4 Xuan Chen CLA 2011-07-13 13:01:39 EDT 
The fix looks good.  Thanks.
Comment 5 David McKnight CLA 2011-07-13 13:14:28 EDT 
Thanks for the review, Xuan.  I've committed the change to cvs.  

Li, let me know whether a backport is needed.
Comment 6 Li Ding CLA 2011-07-14 15:27:43 EDT 
Yes, it needs a backport because our product picks up RSE 3.2.2.
Comment 7 David McKnight CLA 2011-07-14 16:18:42 EDT 
(In reply to comment #6)
> Yes, it needs a backport because our product picks up RSE 3.2.2.

I've created bug 352159 for the backport.
Comment 8 Martin Oberhuber CLA 2011-07-18 11:35:07 EDT 
Released > I20110718, tagged as R33x_v201107181530