Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 349726 - [textile] table of contents should include a CSS class to facilitate styling
Summary: [textile] table of contents should include a CSS class to facilitate styling
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: z_Archived
Classification: Eclipse Foundation
Component: Mylyn (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows 7
: P3 enhancement (vote)
Target Milestone: 1.5.1   Edit
Assignee: David Green CLA
QA Contact: David Green CLA
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-06-17 15:47 EDT by David Green CLA
Modified: 2011-07-14 20:26 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:

Attachments
mylyn/context/zip (43.89 KB, application/octet-stream)
2011-06-17 16:00 EDT, David Green CLA 		no flags Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description David Green CLA 2011-06-17 15:47:14 EDT 
When using Textile markup, WikiText extends Textile with the following

bc. {toc}

the emitted table of contents can include a list-style as follows:

bc. {toc:style=circle}

however there is  no way to affect the CSS class in the ouput.  With this enhancement, a CSS class can be specified as follows:

bc. {toc:class=tableOfContents}

if unspecified, the class should default to "toc".
Comment 1 David Green CLA 2011-06-17 15:52:51 EDT 
note that previously if unspecified the table of contents is emitted with a @<ol class="toc"@
Comment 2 David Green CLA 2011-06-17 16:00:20 EDT 
implemented
Comment 3 David Green CLA 2011-06-17 16:00:22 EDT 
Created attachment 198212 [details]
mylyn/context/zip
Comment 4 Steffen Pingel CLA 2011-06-20 08:18:38 EDT 
I don't see any changes in the repository? Note that this bug is marked for 1.5.1 which requires changes to be present on the e_3_7_m_3_6_x branch to be included in the service release.
Comment 5 David Green CLA 2011-07-14 19:53:41 EDT 
Thanks for checking Steffen. The commit id is 7a0e52e936c2b96c2075f4735eb6e7f3114b98df, which for me appears to be on e_3_7_m_3_6_x and master.  Am I missing something?
Comment 6 David Green CLA 2011-07-14 19:55:25 EDT 
Actually the equivalent commit on master is 70520ac4b476c6a63a7d76bdc4fba840ae59b45f
Comment 7 Steffen Pingel CLA 2011-07-14 20:26:12 EDT 
Excellent. I have both commits in the history.