Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 348410 - [releng] Difference between 3.7 and 4.1
Summary: [releng] Difference between 3.7 and 4.1
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: e4
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: UI (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified   Edit
Hardware: PC Linux
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Project Inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-06-06 11:01 EDT by Paul Webster CLA
Modified: 2011-06-07 07:56 EDT (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Paul Webster CLA 2011-06-06 11:01:41 EDT
I've done a compare between 3.7 RC4 and our 4.1 RC4 candidate.  We need to make sure we understand or have a fix for the following.

The most notable differences that seem out of place are:
< 3.7

> 4.1

We include a later version of jsch.  I thought we did this deliberately, but I'm not sure:
< com.jcraft.jsch_0.1.41.v201101211617.jar
---
> com.jcraft.jsch_0.1.44.v201101211721.jar


I'm not sure why these 2 plugins are missing.  Is this a legacy app that we wanted to go away?
< org.eclipse.help.appserver_3.1.400.v20110425.jar
< org.eclipse.help.appserver.source_3.1.400.v20110425.jar

We've branched org.eclipse.ui and deprecated all of the action schema.  This seems like we should update the version to 3.100 like we did for org.eclipse.ui.workbench.  John?
< org.eclipse.ui_3.7.0.I20110602-0100.jar
< org.eclipse.ui.source_3.7.0.I20110602-0100.jar
---
> org.eclipse.ui_3.7.0.v20110506-1500.jar
> org.eclipse.ui.source_3.7.0.v20110506-1500.jar


I don't believe these 2 sections are problems:

We include a much larger segment of lucene, but our lucene core matches up so I don't think this is a problem:
> org.apache.lucene.highlighter_2.9.1.v20100421-0704.jar
> org.apache.lucene.memory_2.9.1.v20100421-0704.jar
> org.apache.lucene.misc_2.9.1.v20100421-0704.jar
> org.apache.lucene.queries_2.9.1.v20100421-0704.jar
> org.apache.lucene.snowball_2.9.1.v20100421-0704.jar
> org.apache.lucene.spellchecker_2.9.1.v20100421-0704.jar


We've dropped these plugins, I believe deliberately:
< org.eclipse.core.boot_3.1.200.v20100505.jar
< org.eclipse.ui.presentations.r21_3.2.200.I20100517-1500.jar
< org.eclipse.ui.presentations.r21.source_3.2.200.I20100517-1500.jar
< org.eclipse.ui.workbench.compatibility_3.2.100.I20110413-1600/
< org.eclipse.ui.workbench.compatibility.source_3.2.100.I20110413-1600.jar
< org.eclipse.update.core.source_3.2.500.v20110330.jar
< org.eclipse.update.scheduler_3.2.300.v20100512.jar
< org.eclipse.update.scheduler.source_3.2.300.v20100512.jar
< org.eclipse.update.ui_3.2.300.v20100512.jar
< org.eclipse.update.ui.source_3.2.300.v20100512.jar


PW
Comment 1 Remy Suen CLA 2011-06-06 11:05:40 EDT
(In reply to comment #0)
> I'm not sure why these 2 plugins are missing.  Is this a legacy app that we
> wanted to go away?
> < org.eclipse.help.appserver_3.1.400.v20110425.jar
> < org.eclipse.help.appserver.source_3.1.400.v20110425.jar

We dropped this deliberately. See bug 216322 and bug 337073.
Comment 2 Paul Webster CLA 2011-06-06 14:02:12 EDT
(In reply to comment #0)
> We've branched org.eclipse.ui and deprecated all of the action schema.  This
> seems like we should update the version to 3.100 like we did for
> org.eclipse.ui.workbench.  John?
> < org.eclipse.ui_3.7.0.I20110602-0100.jar
> < org.eclipse.ui.source_3.7.0.I20110602-0100.jar
> ---
> > org.eclipse.ui_3.7.0.v20110506-1500.jar
> > org.eclipse.ui.source_3.7.0.v20110506-1500.jar
> 


I talked to John about this.  Because we branched org.eclipse.ui in 4.1 we should up-version the minor segment: 3.100.0. But because we're in RC4 and other projects might (rightly or wrongly) have an exclusion range on this project, we should do nothing now (and up-version it really on in 4.2)


I don't believe anything else needs action in this bug, but I'm still curious about the effects of moving to com.jcraft.jsch_0.1.44

PW
Comment 3 Paul Webster CLA 2011-06-07 07:56:01 EDT
I don't believe there are any actions here.

PW