Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 348242 - [releng] Pack200 files missing in repository metadata
Summary: [releng] Pack200 files missing in repository metadata
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: RAP
Classification: RT
Component: Releng (show other bugs)
Version: 1.4   Edit
Hardware: PC Linux
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: 2.2   Edit
Assignee: Project Inbox CLA
QA Contact: Markus Knauer CLA
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-06-03 12:38 EDT by Ralf Sternberg CLA
Modified: 2014-01-09 09:28 EST (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Ralf Sternberg CLA 2011-06-03 12:38:51 EDT
It seems that the *.pack.gz files are not included in the p2 metadata of our repositories.
See http://build.eclipse.org/indigo/simrel/reports/pack200data.txt
A quick
  rsternber@dev1:~/download/1.4/runtime/RC3> zless content.jar | grep pack.gz
  rsternber@dev1:~/download/1.4/runtime/RC3> zless artifacts.jar | grep pack.gz
returns no matches.
Comment 1 Beyhan Veliev CLA 2011-06-10 11:16:48 EDT
After some debugging and testing I found out that the program argument "-reusePack200Files" does the magic. We are currently calling the publisher with the program argument " -reusepackedFiles". If we use instead "-reusePack200Files" then the artifacts metadata contains the information about the pack200 artifacts. According to the p2 documentation both program arguments should have the same effect but ... I can't create a patch because the "publishNightlyBuild.sh" script is a binary but we just need to replace the "-reusepackedFiles" in our publisher script.
Comment 2 Beyhan Veliev CLA 2011-06-10 12:15:13 EDT
Just for the record. I created a bug against p2 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=349069.
Comment 3 Ralf Sternberg CLA 2012-09-07 05:38:20 EDT
Markus, do you know if this bug is still valid?
Comment 4 Markus Knauer CLA 2014-01-09 09:28:18 EST
I didn't invest the time to check comment #1 but I can confirm that the problem has been solved with RAP 2.2 and the change of the build together with this release. The new repositories do contain the pack.gz files (and they are referenced in the artifacts.jar).