Community
Participate
Working Groups
Version: 0.7.9.I20110207-1700 SVN Client: org.eclipse.team.svn.connector.svnkit16 2.2.2.I20110124-1700 SVN/1.6.15 SVNKit/1.3.5 (http://svnkit.com/) r7406 JVM Properties: {java.runtime.name=Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment, java.runtime.version=1.6.0_24-b07, java.vendor=Sun Microsystems Inc., line.separator= , java.class.version=50.0, os.name=Windows XP, os.arch=x86, user.country=IT, os.version=5.1, eclipse.commands=-os win32 -ws win32 -arch x86 -showsplash C:\Programmi\eclipse-SDK-3.6.2-win32\eclipse\\plugins\org.eclipse.platform_3.6.2.v201102101200\splash.bmp -launcher C:\Programmi\eclipse-SDK-3.6.2-win32\eclipse\eclipse.exe -name Eclipse --launcher.library C:\Programmi\eclipse-SDK-3.6.2-win32\eclipse\\plugins/org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.win32.win32.x86_1.1.2.R36x_v20101222\eclipse_1312.dll -startup C:\Programmi\eclipse-SDK-3.6.2-win32\eclipse\\plugins/org.eclipse.equinox.launcher_1.1.1.R36x_v20101122_1400.jar -vm C:/Programmi/Java/jdk1.6.0_24/bin/../jre/bin\client\jvm.dll , java.version=1.6.0_24, osgi.framework.version=3.6.2.R36x_v20110210, file.separator=\, java.vm.info=mixed mode, path.separator=;, user.timezone=Europe/Berlin, user.language=it, java.vm.name=Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM, file.encoding=Cp1252} java.lang.RuntimeException: Error_UnrecognizedNodeKind java.lang.RuntimeException: Error_UnrecognizedNodeKind at org.eclipse.team.svn.core.utility.SVNUtility.getNodeKind(SVNUtility.java:1079) at org.eclipse.team.svn.ui.compare.ResourceCompareInput.getNodeKind(ResourceCompareInput.java:372) at org.eclipse.team.svn.ui.compare.ThreeWayResourceCompareInput.makeBranch(ThreeWayResourceCompareInput.java:238) at org.eclipse.team.svn.ui.compare.ThreeWayResourceCompareInput.initialize(ThreeWayResourceCompareInput.java:225) at org.eclipse.team.svn.ui.operation.CompareResourcesInternalOperation$4.run(CompareResourcesInternalOperation.java:164) at org.eclipse.team.svn.core.utility.ProgressMonitorUtility.doSubTask(ProgressMonitorUtility.java:118) at org.eclipse.team.svn.core.operation.AbstractActionOperation.protectStep(AbstractActionOperation.java:154) at org.eclipse.team.svn.ui.operation.CompareResourcesInternalOperation.runImpl(CompareResourcesInternalOperation.java:157) at org.eclipse.team.svn.ui.operation.CompareResourcesOperation$1.runImpl(CompareResourcesOperation.java:64) at org.eclipse.team.svn.core.operation.AbstractActionOperation.run(AbstractActionOperation.java:81) at org.eclipse.team.svn.core.utility.ProgressMonitorUtility.doTask(ProgressMonitorUtility.java:104) at org.eclipse.team.svn.core.operation.CompositeOperation.runImpl(CompositeOperation.java:95) at org.eclipse.team.svn.core.operation.AbstractActionOperation.run(AbstractActionOperation.java:81) at org.eclipse.team.svn.core.utility.ProgressMonitorUtility.doTask(ProgressMonitorUtility.java:104) at org.eclipse.team.svn.core.operation.CompositeOperation.runImpl(CompositeOperation.java:95) at org.eclipse.team.svn.core.operation.AbstractActionOperation.run(AbstractActionOperation.java:81) at org.eclipse.team.svn.core.operation.LoggedOperation.run(LoggedOperation.java:39) at org.eclipse.team.svn.core.utility.ProgressMonitorUtility.doTask(ProgressMonitorUtility.java:104) at org.eclipse.team.svn.core.utility.ProgressMonitorUtility.doTaskExternal(ProgressMonitorUtility.java:90) at org.eclipse.team.svn.ui.utility.DefaultCancellableOperationWrapper.run(DefaultCancellableOperationWrapper.java:55) at org.eclipse.team.svn.ui.utility.SVNTeamOperationWrapper.run(SVNTeamOperationWrapper.java:35) at org.eclipse.team.internal.ui.actions.JobRunnableContext.run(JobRunnableContext.java:144) at org.eclipse.team.internal.ui.actions.JobRunnableContext$ResourceJob.runInWorkspace(JobRunnableContext.java:72) at org.eclipse.core.internal.resources.InternalWorkspaceJob.run(InternalWorkspaceJob.java:38) at org.eclipse.core.internal.jobs.Worker.run(Worker.java:54)
Duplicate of bug #338876. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 338876 ***
(In reply to comment #1) > Duplicate of bug #338876. > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 338876 *** If it is not a duplicate, does this bug deserve to be reopened? Massimo
(In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Duplicate of bug #338876. > > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 338876 *** > > If it is not a duplicate, does this bug deserve to be reopened? > Massimo Is it important which one of two similar bug reports was marked as duplicate? If you could prove it is not the same issue, then, of course, I could reopen the report, for now I see no difference between reported issues.