Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 346822 - Preview for the eclipse application shows the version as 3.6
Summary: Preview for the eclipse application shows the version as 3.6
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Equinox
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: Launcher (show other bugs)
Version: 3.7   Edit
Hardware: Macintosh Mac OS X - Carbon (unsup.)
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: 3.7 RC3   Edit
Assignee: Project Inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-05-23 02:10 EDT by Jay Arthanareeswaran CLA
Modified: 2011-05-25 08:28 EDT (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
aniefer: review+
dj.houghton: review+
jeffmcaffer: review+


Attachments
patch (6.53 KB, patch)
2011-05-23 09:18 EDT, Thomas Watson CLA
no flags Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jay Arthanareeswaran CLA 2011-05-23 02:10:42 EDT

    
Comment 1 Jay Arthanareeswaran CLA 2011-05-23 02:14:40 EDT
Build ID: I20110521-0800

Open the eclipse installation folder and click on the eclipse application. The version shown in the preview is "3.6" and not "3.7".

Also, when "More Info" is clicked, version is shown as "Eclipse 3.6 for Mac OS X..." and copyright has "2002, 2010"
Comment 2 Prakash Rangaraj CLA 2011-05-23 02:18:25 EDT
I guess the Info.plist comes from Equinox. Please reassign if not.
Comment 3 Thomas Watson CLA 2011-05-23 09:18:27 EDT
Created attachment 196333 [details]
patch

Updated Info.plist to use 3.8.
Comment 4 Thomas Watson CLA 2011-05-23 09:21:44 EDT
(In reply to comment #3)
> Created attachment 196333 [details]
> patch
> 
> Updated Info.plist to use 3.8.

I meant to use 3.7.  I also opened bug346871 to remember to do this next release.
Comment 5 Thomas Watson CLA 2011-05-23 09:24:17 EDT
Probably going a little overboard with the required reviews on this one.  DJ, Andrew and Jeff please review.
Comment 6 Andrew Niefer CLA 2011-05-24 11:02:45 EDT
Looks ok to me
Comment 7 Thomas Watson CLA 2011-05-24 13:42:30 EDT
I released the patch to HEAD.  Still need a +1 from Jeff.  But I think we could consider this a documentation bug.