Community
Participate
Working Groups
The latest version of the specification renamed disjunctive type to be union type. This should be reflected inside class, field, methods names.
Satyam, please follow up, TIA.
Created attachment 195866 [details] Patch Modified all references to disjunctive to union. Even modified the comments too. Haven't included the parser resource files in the patch as there are binary.
Released the patch
Deepak, I have made changes to all references to Disjunctive type to Union type. If you have used this type, please modify accordingly.
Thanks Satyam. I have updated the references in o.e.jdt.ui. 3 files were modified. GenericVisitor.java ASTFlattener.java HierarchicalASTVisitor.java
I found a few left overs: CompletionParser and ThrownExceptionFinder have some local variables like: UnionTypeReference disjunctiveTypeReference Should we include the (trivial) fix in this bug, too?
(In reply to comment #6) > I found a few left overs: CompletionParser and ThrownExceptionFinder > have some local variables like: > UnionTypeReference disjunctiveTypeReference > > Should we include the (trivial) fix in this bug, too? yes please.
Created attachment 198736 [details] renaming left overs This patch renames the local variables mentioned in comment 6 and adjusts two comments in tests.
Verified by code inspection: After applying the patch from comment 8 jdt.core and its test projects contain no more mentions of "disjunctive" (except in buildnotes).