Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 345366 - comparator error: LaunchViewCopyToClipboardActionDelegate.java: sizes differ by 33 bytes
Summary: comparator error: LaunchViewCopyToClipboardActionDelegate.java: sizes differ ...
Status: VERIFIED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Platform
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: Debug (show other bugs)
Version: 3.7   Edit
Hardware: All All
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: 3.7 RC1   Edit
Assignee: Pawel Piech CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-05-11 03:16 EDT by Dani Megert CLA
Modified: 2011-05-16 03:35 EDT (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Michael_Rennie: review+

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Dani Megert CLA 2011-05-11 03:16:24 EDT 
I20110510-0800.

LaunchViewCopyToClipboardActionDelegate.java: sizes differ by 33 bytes

'org.eclipse.debug.ui' probably needs to be released with a new tag.

Before doing that I'd like clarify some points:
1. Kim: did you update the builder?
2. if so, Olivier: do we have a change in the compiler that justifies the byte
   code difference?
Comment 1 Pawel Piech CLA 2011-05-11 11:15:00 EDT 
It's my fault.  I tried releasing this module but I ended up only moving the existing tag.
Comment 2 Dani Megert CLA 2011-05-11 11:34:50 EDT 
(In reply to comment #1)
> It's my fault.  I tried releasing this module but I ended up only moving the
> existing tag.

Thanks for letting us know. Note that moving tags is discouraged unless one knows for sure what one is doing ;-). The Releng tool should always be used to to the build input.

Can you make a build input (Team > Release), so that the bytes get back in order?
Comment 3 Olivier Thomann CLA 2011-05-11 11:40:17 EDT 
(In reply to comment #1)
> It's my fault.  I tried releasing this module but I ended up only moving the
> existing tag.
A tag cannot be reused if a build occurred and consumed that tag.
Comment 4 Pawel Piech CLA 2011-05-11 15:08:56 EDT 
I retagged and released using v20110511.  Sorry about the mess.  Mike please review my tagging.
Comment 5 Michael Rennie CLA 2011-05-11 15:32:53 EDT 
The jdtdebug map file looks good
Comment 6 Dani Megert CLA 2011-05-16 03:35:07 EDT 
The comparator test no longer failed in I20110514-0800.