Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 344915 - org.eclipse.equinox.core.sdk needs to be released
Summary: org.eclipse.equinox.core.sdk needs to be released
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 330006
Alias: None
Product: Equinox
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: Framework (show other bugs)
Version: 3.7   Edit
Hardware: All All
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: 3.7 RC1   Edit
Assignee: equinox.framework-inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-05-06 02:13 EDT by Dani Megert CLA
Modified: 2011-05-10 11:01 EDT (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
daniel_megert: review+

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Dani Megert CLA 2011-05-06 02:13:35 EDT 
I20110505-0800.

The comparator complained again.
Comment 1 DJ Houghton CLA 2011-05-06 07:38:35 EDT 
Retagged or increase the version number? This is hard to read and decipher.

http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/drops/I20110505-0800/testresults/versiontool/results.xml
Comment 2 Dani Megert CLA 2011-05-06 08:03:04 EDT 
(In reply to comment #1)
> Retagged or increase the version number? This is hard to read and decipher.
> 
> http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/drops/I20110505-0800/testresults/versiontool/results.xml

This is not the comparator log ;-)

This is it:
http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/drops/I20110505-0800/buildlogs/comparatorlog.txt

Release == Team > Release...
This is usually enough to satisfy the comparator as we only need the bytes to be rebuilt.
Comment 3 DJ Houghton CLA 2011-05-06 08:17:07 EDT 
hehe ok, done.
Comment 4 Thomas Watson CLA 2011-05-06 08:28:18 EDT 
Is there anyway the releng tools could account for this and warn us that we need to retag a feature?
Comment 5 Dani Megert CLA 2011-05-06 08:31:15 EDT 
(In reply to comment #4)
> Is there anyway the releng tools could account for this and warn us that we
> need to retag a feature?

I don't think so. AFAIK the comparator looks at the bytes generated by the build.
Comment 6 Dani Megert CLA 2011-05-09 02:27:53 EDT 
Verified in I20110507-0800.
Comment 7 Dani Megert CLA 2011-05-10 01:17:58 EDT 
Comparator test failed again.

Why is this happening all the time?
Comment 9 Thomas Watson CLA 2011-05-10 10:14:47 EDT 
(In reply to comment #7)
> Comparator test failed again.
> 
> Why is this happening all the time?

I have no idea, because we did not contribute to this build.
Comment 10 Andrew Niefer CLA 2011-05-10 11:01:47 EDT 
This looks like a false positive in the comparator, I found bug 330006 comment #2,

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 330006 ***