Community
Participate
Working Groups
As far as I know, these slaves no longer exist, and I find it confusing to see them in the weekly disk usage reports. I suspect its just some stale data that needs to be removed, or similar. Besides just bugging me, I think it makes the whole report appear questionable or of lower quality, if it contains something apparently wrong. Maybe I'm the only one bugged by it, ... but, just wanted you to know some of us read those reports :) Thanks = = = = = = ==== hudson-slave2.eclipse.org ==== /dev/xvda1 96G 48G 48G 50% / -> Usage exceeding 1GB for: Hudson workspace on hudson-slave2 (50G capacity) (2011-03-02T10:00) 16.7G Eclipse-3.6.2-test 2.2G cbi-scout-3.7 1.8G virgo.kernel.snapshot 1.4G tycho-mat-nightly 1.3G cbi-mat-nightly 1.3G cbi-papyrus-0.7-nightly 1.1G cbi-papyrus-integration 1.1G cbi-wtp-wst.jsdt 1.1G cbi-jubula-0.9-helios 1.1G cbi-jubula-0.9-nightly ==== END: hudson-slave2.eclipse.org ==== ==== hudson-slave3.eclipse.org ==== /dev/xvda1 55G 11G 45G 20% / -> Usage exceeding 1GB for: Hudson workspace on hudson-slave3 (50G capacity) (2011-05-03T10:00) 1.5G matt_test 1.2G Xtext-nightly-HEAD ==== END: hudson-slave3.eclipse.org ====
I've removed slave2(old output data). But slave3 is still there, I think the disconnect is that the disk usage reports the 'host' name and not the 'slave name' in hudson. In this case slave3 == fastlane. -M.