Description Sebastian Zarnekow 2011-05-03 08:10:35 EDT

Currently the return type is the actual type of the create expression. This may expose implementation detail. A workaround is to use a cast expression but that leads to a too generic type in the initializer expression.

create MyType result: new MyTypeImpl() newMyType(String something) {
  result.setPropertyWhichIsNotInTheInterface(something);
}

This seems a little counter intuitive to me. Another option is:

MyType create result: newTypeImpl(..) newMyType(String something) {
 ..
}

which would be more in line with the definition of other operations.