Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 344482 - More validation would make using eef way more confortable
Summary: More validation would make using eef way more confortable
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: EEF
Classification: Modeling
Component: General (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified   Edit
Hardware: PC Linux
: P3 minor
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: EEF Inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-05-02 12:19 EDT by Romain Guider CLA
Modified: 2016-05-30 11:34 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Romain Guider CLA 2011-05-02 12:19:12 EDT 
Build Identifier: Validation problems

 The validation doesn't report when a representation is missing in the
 Container attached to the View element. This is confusing because the
 generated code doesn't compile and the relation between the cause and
 the effect isn't that obvious!

 Duplicate naming of Views under the Category aren't reported by the
 validator and result in erroneous code generation.


Reproducible: Always
Comment 1 Stephane Begaudeau CLA 2016-05-30 11:34:16 EDT 
The Eclipse EEF team has worked over the past few months on a brand new runtime using a reflective approach which can be used more easily with Eclipse Sirius. Since we do not plan to continue to work on the old runtime and its code generation approach, I will close this issue for now.

If you want to contribute, you can reopen this issue and submit a contribution to the project thanks to our Gerrit: https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/admin/projects/eef/org.eclipse.eef