Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 344231 - [DB] Improve Statement.executeBatch result checking
Summary: [DB] Improve Statement.executeBatch result checking
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: EMF
Classification: Modeling
Component: cdo.db (show other bugs)
Version: 4.1   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 enhancement (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Eike Stepper CLA
QA Contact: Eike Stepper CLA
URL:
Whiteboard: Lighter, Faster and Better
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-04-29 01:20 EDT by Erdal Karaca CLA
Modified: 2012-10-28 06:41 EDT (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Check whether executeBatch() returns Statement.SUCCESS_NO_INFO instead of the count of updates/inserts/deletes (1.48 KB, patch)
2011-04-29 01:22 EDT, Erdal Karaca CLA 		no flags Details | Diff
Patch v2 (4.79 KB, patch)
2011-07-06 04:16 EDT, Eike Stepper CLA 		no flags Details | Diff
Show Obsolete (1) View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Erdal Karaca CLA 2011-04-29 01:20:57 EDT 
Some JDBC drivers (such as Oracle) do not always return the count of updated/inserted rows when using a batch execution. Though, they succeed and just return Statement.SUCCESS_NO_INFO instead of the count of updates/inserts.
Comment 1 Erdal Karaca CLA 2011-04-29 01:22:03 EDT 
Created attachment 194327 [details]
Check whether executeBatch() returns Statement.SUCCESS_NO_INFO instead of the count of updates/inserts/deletes
Comment 2 Eike Stepper CLA 2011-06-23 03:59:02 EDT 
Moving all open enhancement requests to 4.1
Comment 3 Eike Stepper CLA 2011-07-06 04:16:55 EDT 
Created attachment 199168 [details]
Patch v2

A slightly nicer version.

Stefan, it seems as if this doesn't need to be ported to the other mapping strategies because only in non-audit the moving of list elements can happen. Right?
Comment 4 Eike Stepper CLA 2011-07-06 04:19:20 EDT 
Committed revision 8613
Comment 5 Eike Stepper CLA 2012-09-21 07:18:34 EDT 
Closing.
Comment 6 Silvestre Martins CLA 2012-10-25 05:09:50 EDT 
This issue is still reproducible in Oracle.
I could see that the code that this patch changes is not present in last version anymore. It was removed afterwards by commit from https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=366686.

Was this intentional?
Comment 7 Eike Stepper CLA 2012-10-28 05:26:59 EDT 
> Was this intentional?

Hmm, I doubt it. Can you please submit a new bugzilla with a new patch? Then I can apply it quickly...
Comment 8 Silvestre Martins CLA 2012-10-28 06:41:36 EDT 
Created bugzilla https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=392993