Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 342373 - provide history implementation for Bugzilla
Summary: provide history implementation for Bugzilla
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: z_Archived
Classification: Eclipse Foundation
Component: Mylyn (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified   Edit
Hardware: All All
: P3 enhancement (vote)
Target Milestone: 3.6   Edit
Assignee: Steffen Pingel CLA
QA Contact: Frank Becker CLA
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on: 142906
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2011-04-10 13:01 EDT by Steffen Pingel CLA
Modified: 2011-05-30 19:21 EDT (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments
patch (10.08 KB, patch)
2011-04-10 13:08 EDT, Steffen Pingel CLA 		no flags Details | Diff
mylyn/context/zip (1.28 KB, application/octet-stream)
2011-04-10 13:08 EDT, Steffen Pingel CLA 		no flags Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Steffen Pingel CLA 2011-04-10 13:01:26 EDT 
The Bugzilla connector should provide access to the change history of task by implementing the API that was added as part of bug 142906.
Comment 1 Steffen Pingel CLA 2011-04-10 13:08:15 EDT 
Created attachment 192902 [details]
patch
Comment 2 Steffen Pingel CLA 2011-04-10 13:08:17 EDT 
Created attachment 192903 [details]
mylyn/context/zip
Comment 3 Steffen Pingel CLA 2011-04-10 13:09:56 EDT 
I have committed the attached implementation which uses XML-RPC. Frank, if you get a chance it would be great if you could review.

I am wondering if we still need the o.e.m.internal.bugzilla.core.history package or if we should delete that?
Comment 4 Frank Becker CLA 2011-04-16 13:54:32 EDT 
(In reply to comment #3)
> I have committed the attached implementation which uses XML-RPC. Frank, if you
> get a chance it would be great if you could review.

Review done!
I found nothing that we need to change.

> 
> I am wondering if we still need the o.e.m.internal.bugzilla.core.history package
> or if we should delete that?

I think we can delete this. We can use some parts if we want to have a version that works without XMLRPC.

Do you think we should as the eclipse webmaster to activate XMLRPC?
Comment 5 Steffen Pingel CLA 2011-05-22 16:18:37 EDT 
(In reply to comment #4)
> > I am wondering if we still need the o.e.m.internal.bugzilla.core.history
> package
> > or if we should delete that?
> 
> I think we can delete this. We can use some parts if we want to have a version
> that works without XMLRPC.

Makes sense to me. Can you file a bug to do that for 3.7?

> Do you think we should as the eclipse webmaster to activate XMLRPC?

Unfortunately that request has been turned down in the past: bug 266901.

I'll leave this open for now as a reminder to add a few tests.
Comment 6 Steffen Pingel CLA 2011-05-30 19:21:52 EDT 
Marking resolved.