Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 341084 - Behavior of Property Value cell editor after exceeding max characters is incorrect
Summary: Behavior of Property Value cell editor after exceeding max characters is inco...
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Jubula
Classification: Technology
Component: UI (show other bugs)
Version: 0.9.0   Edit
Hardware: PC Linux
: P3 major (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Project Inbox CLA
QA Contact: Oliver Goetz CLA
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-03-28 07:08 EDT by Zeb Ford-Reitz CLA
Modified: 2014-01-08 10:33 EST (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Zeb Ford-Reitz CLA 2011-03-28 07:08:46 EDT
While entering text into a Property Value cell editor, I went over the maximum number of characters allowed in this field (currently 255). A dialog appeared informing me of this, and the Parameter Value was applied. When I activated the cell editor again in order to resolve the issue, the character limit dialog appeared again. When I closed the dialog, the contents of the cell editor were cleared. I was provided with no opportunity to modify the existing text, which would then be completely gone unless I canceled the cell editor by pressing Escape or reverted the editor.

I would expect that the display of the character limit dialog does not deactivate my active cell editor, automatically applying my obviously unfinished changes. Instead, I would like the cell editor to be active after closing the dialog. I would expect the character that "caused" the dialog to not be entered.

In the same vein, I would expect that activation of the cell editor does not clear the editor. Perhaps it would be possible to present the contents as-is, allowing the user to resolve the issue before deactivating the editor in order to apply the changes. Barring that, perhaps the contents could be truncated to the maximum length.
Comment 1 Alexandra Schladebeck CLA 2014-01-08 08:32:54 EST
I agree with much of this, but I'm doing some spring cleaning. Since we've not got around to it thus far, and no one else has commented or added a ticket, it looks like it's not going to get done anytime in the near future. If anyone has other comments or reasons for fixing / prioritizing higher, please reopen.
Comment 2 Oliver Goetz CLA 2014-01-08 10:33:02 EST
Closed due to comment 1