Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 340231 - In AspectJ CVS, some files are not tagged with V1_6_12
Summary: In AspectJ CVS, some files are not tagged with V1_6_12
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: AspectJ
Classification: Tools
Component: Build (show other bugs)
Version: 1.6.12   Edit
Hardware: PC Linux
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: aspectj inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-03-16 15:47 EDT by Damien Raude-Morvan CLA
Modified: 2011-11-23 12:52 EST (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Damien Raude-Morvan CLA 2011-03-16 15:47:07 EDT 
Hi,

I'm Debian GNU/Linux packager of aspectj [1]. As you might already know, we rebuild all our JAR from source (either from an upstream source tarball or directly from CVS). I'm trying to update our package to AspectJ 1.6.11 upstream release using CVS tag V1_6_11 but it seems that some files are not tagged and build failed :

For example, ".project" of new "org.aspect.matcher" module is not tagged correctly [2] : I can see there is a V1_6_11RC1 tag but no final V1_6_11 one.

Could you please have a look at this issue ?

[1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/aspectj
[2] http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/viewvc.cgi/org.aspectj/modules/org.aspectj.matcher/.project?root=Tools_Project&view=log

Cheers,
-- 
Damien Raude-Morvan
Comment 1 Andrew Clement CLA 2011-03-17 01:51:32 EDT 
Hi, I followed link (2), it shows tags:

CVS Tags: HEAD, PRE_J5, PRE_PUSHIN, V1_6_10, V1_6_10RC1, V1_6_11, V1_6_11M1, V1_6_11RC1, V1_6_3, V1_6_3rc1, V1_6_4, V1_6_5, V1_6_6, V1_6_7, V1_6_8, V1_6_9, V1_6_9M1, V1_6_9M2, V1_6_9RC2, pre268419

which includes V1_6_11

Perhaps the tag hadn't percolated through to the anonymous cvs access mechanism when you first tried - can you retry?  I did tag the whole of AspectJ in one go and didn't see any errors.  If you can give me a file that is definetly missing the tag I'll investigate a bit more.

cheers
Andy
Comment 2 Damien Raude-Morvan CLA 2011-03-19 07:03:42 EDT 
Hi Andy,

This work for me now. Maybe there is some lag between internal and anonymous CVS server (that's just weird that some files where in sync and some not).

Thanks for your time. You can close this issue.

-- 
Damien Raude-Morvan
Comment 3 Damien Raude-Morvan CLA 2011-11-22 18:23:36 EST 
Hi,

I'm re-opening this issue as, when exporting CVS tag V1_6_12, it seems that some files are not tagged (like previously in V1_6_11).

For exemple [1] file has only V1_6_12M1, V1_6_12M2 and V1_6_12RC1 but no V1_6_12. Since 1.6.12 release happened on 18-Oct-11, I would have been expected that anonymous release should be in sync.

Could you please check from your side ? Or maybe get in touch with Eclipse Infra. Team ?

[1] http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/viewvc.cgi/org.aspectj/modules/org.aspectj.matcher/.project?root=Tools_Project&view=log

Regards,
Damien Raude-Morvan
Comment 4 Andrew Clement CLA 2011-11-23 12:52:17 EST 
fixed up, there was no 1.6.12 tag, so I just retagged 1.6.12.rc1 as 1.6.12.