Community
Participate
Working Groups
Let's use a shared license as explained here: http://relengofthenerds.blogspot.com/2011/01/implementing-shared-licenses-with-37m5.html
This approach would allow us to keep the license text in a shared feature. However, it would require an additional feature (the "license feature"). Given the small number of features in RAP, I currently think that shared licenses would not really simplify matters for us. It's just another indirection. Looking at the License Consistency report for Kepler [1], all our licenses are up to date. [1] http://build.eclipse.org/simrel/kepler/reporeports/reports/licenseConsistency.html