334606 – [c++0x] Double right angle brackets formatting breaks list initializers when mixed inside a namespace

Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.

Bug 334606 - [c++0x] Double right angle brackets formatting breaks list initializers when mixed inside a namespace

Summary: [c++0x] Double right angle brackets formatting breaks list initializers when ...

Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 333816

Alias:	None

Product:	CDT
Classification:	Tools
Component:	cdt-editor (show other bugs)
Version:	7.0.1
Hardware:	PC Linux

Importance:	P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone:	---
Assignee:	Project Inbox
QA Contact:	Anton Leherbauer

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2011-01-17 22:19 EST by David E. Narvaez
Modified:	2011-01-20 02:36 EST (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Example file for testing (197 bytes, text/x-c) 2011-01-17 22:24 EST, David E. Narvaez	no flags	Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description David E. Narvaez

2011-01-17 22:19:52 EST

Build Identifier: M20100909-0800

I guess this is a hard one to catch:

Say you have your Code Style configured to have list initializers in the same line. Then, let's say you have a list initializer and you have double right angle brackets in the same file and these are both in a namespace.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Configure the Code Style to have list initializers in the same line of declaration
2. Open a namespace
3. Use double right angle brackets inside the namespace
4. Use list initializers in the same namespace
5. Try autoformatting

Comment 1 David E. Narvaez

2011-01-17 22:24:12 EST

Created attachment 186965 [details]
Example file for testing

An example file showing the situation. You can play around with formatting in this file. Notice that commenting the bogus function shows yet another formatting weirdness that may be related to the same issue.

Comment 2 Anton Leherbauer

2011-01-18 09:27:05 EST

This appears to be fixed with bug 333816.  Please confirm.

Comment 3 David E. Narvaez

2011-01-19 23:55:01 EST

(In reply to comment #2)
> This appears to be fixed with bug 333816.  Please confirm.

Confirmed, sorry for that: I lost track of the versions among my Eclipse installations.

Thanks again!

David E. Narváez

Comment 4 Anton Leherbauer

2011-01-20 02:36:40 EST

Thanks for verifying.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 333816 ***