Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 333492 - Submit code changes related to SCI security/SCI_Error support, fixing bugs
Summary: Submit code changes related to SCI security/SCI_Error support, fixing bugs
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: PTP
Classification: Tools
Component: SCI (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified   Edit
Hardware: PC Linux
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Tu Hong Jun CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-01-04 11:23 EST by rong li CLA
Modified: 2011-05-14 06:32 EDT (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments
To fix the issue (13.61 KB, patch)
2011-01-04 11:25 EST, rong li CLA 		g.watson: iplog+
Details | Diff
Updated the patch (27.87 KB, patch)
2011-01-26 21:21 EST, rong li CLA 		g.watson: iplog+
Details | Diff
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description rong li CLA 2011-01-04 11:23:18 EST 
Build Identifier: 

1. Check in the code related to SCI security and SCI_Error.
2. Fix an issue when calling 'getPeerProcessor()'.
3. Fix an coredump issue when scia is not found.
4. Fix an big endian/little endian issue .
5. Fix an issue when socket number exceeds the sockfd buffer size.

Reproducible: Always
Comment 1 rong li CLA 2011-01-04 11:25:31 EST 
Created attachment 186020 [details]
To fix the issue

Attached the patch.
Comment 2 rong li CLA 2011-01-26 21:21:16 EST 
Created attachment 187707 [details]
Updated the patch
Comment 3 Greg Watson CLA 2011-02-09 21:05:56 EST 
Please commit this patch.
Comment 4 Tu Hong Jun CLA 2011-02-10 11:01:53 EST 
How to commit it, the first attachment has some problem and I applied the second one at least two weeks ago, so now I will mark it as resolved.
Comment 5 rong li CLA 2011-02-10 20:59:18 EST 
The first patch does not have the code issues. But as it is created by comparing: diff -r <new_codes> <old_codes>, I submitted the second patch with:
diff -ruN <old_codes> <new_codes> for convention.
If there is a way to delete the first patch, pls feel free to let me know.
Thanks for all your helps.