Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 333485 - MCQ request email sent after it had been received
Summary: MCQ request email sent after it had been received
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Community
Classification: Eclipse Foundation
Component: Project Management & Portal (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified   Edit
Hardware: PC Linux
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Portal Bugzilla Dummy Inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard: stalebug
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-01-04 10:41 EST by Wayne Beaton CLA
Modified: 2017-03-27 21:56 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Wayne Beaton CLA 2011-01-04 10:41:15 EST
XXX submitted the online questionnaire on December 23rd and the system was aware that he had completed the questionnaire.  Therefore, the system should not have sent him a reminder.  We may need to investigate to determine if we need to tweak our Notification system for going forward.
 
-----Original Message-----

> By the way: the portal page reads: "Received NCRF; member; received MCQ"
> which indicates that the MCQ (I suppose this is short for "Member
> Committer Questionnaire") was already received. Can I assume this e-mail
> is obsolete?

> On 01/01/2011 05:59 AM, portal on behalf of emo wrote:

>> XXX,
>> To complete your election as a new committer on the modeling.mdt.ocl
>> project, you need to fill out the online Member Committer Questionnaire
>> http://www.eclipse.org/legal/committer_process/member_committer_questionnai
>> re.php
>>  
>> More than one week has passed since you received the original email about
>> filling out this form. Creating your account and CVS/SVN access is
>> blocked
>> until we receive this form. Please fill out the form today.
>>  
>>  
>> *NOTE*: Successful elections are left open for a maximum of 120 days to
>> allow for processing of paperwork.  After that time the election will be
>> expired, regardless of its current status.  Should papework processing on
>> the part of the candidate take more time than allowed, a new election
>> will
>> have to be held.
>>  
>> If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact your project
>> lead, PMC member, or the EMO< emo@eclipse.org >
Comment 1 Eclipse Genie CLA 2014-10-17 11:05:54 EDT
This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet.

If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant.

--
The automated Eclipse Genie.
Comment 2 Eclipse Genie CLA 2016-10-09 07:59:03 EDT
This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet.

If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant.

--
The automated Eclipse Genie.
Comment 3 Wayne Beaton CLA 2017-03-27 21:56:23 EDT
We're reimplementing this functionality in the PMI. WONTFIX.