Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.
Bug 332707 - NegativeArraySizeException from LogView
Summary: NegativeArraySizeException from LogView
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: PDE
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: UI (show other bugs)
Version: 3.5.2   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: PDE-UI-Inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard: stalebug
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-12-16 04:30 EST by Marco Maccaferri CLA
Modified: 2019-09-09 02:36 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Marco Maccaferri CLA 2010-12-16 04:30:17 EST
Build Identifier: M20100211-1343

A user of our RCP product report this exception:

java.lang.NegativeArraySizeException
 at org.eclipse.ui.internal.views.log.LogView.getElements(LogView.java:772)
 at org.eclipse.ui.internal.views.log.LogViewContentProvider.getElements(LogViewContentProvider.java:32)
 at org.eclipse.jface.viewers.StructuredViewer.getRawChildren(StructuredViewer.java:959)
 at org.eclipse.jface.viewers.ColumnViewer.getRawChildren(ColumnViewer.java:703)
 at org.eclipse.jface.viewers.AbstractTreeViewer.getRawChildren(AbstractTreeViewer.java:1330)
 at org.eclipse.jface.viewers.TreeViewer.getRawChildren(TreeViewer.java:390)
 at org.eclipse.jface.viewers.AbstractTreeViewer.getFilteredChildren(AbstractTreeViewer.java:636)
 at org.eclipse.jface.viewers.AbstractTreeViewer.getSortedChildren(AbstractTreeViewer.java:602)
 at org.eclipse.jface.viewers.AbstractTreeViewer.updateChildren(AbstractTreeViewer.java:2578)
 at org.eclipse.jface.viewers.AbstractTreeViewer.internalRefreshStruct(AbstractTreeViewer.java:1863)
 at org.eclipse.jface.viewers.TreeViewer.internalRefreshStruct(TreeViewer.java:716)
 at org.eclipse.jface.viewers.AbstractTreeViewer.internalRefresh(AbstractTreeViewer.java:1838)
 at org.eclipse.jface.viewers.AbstractTreeViewer.internalRefresh(AbstractTreeViewer.java:1794)
 at org.eclipse.jface.viewers.AbstractTreeViewer.internalRefresh(AbstractTreeViewer.java:1780)
 at org.eclipse.jface.viewers.StructuredViewer$7.run(StructuredViewer.java:1457)
 at org.eclipse.jface.viewers.StructuredViewer.preservingSelection(StructuredViewer.java:1392)
 at org.eclipse.jface.viewers.TreeViewer.preservingSelection(TreeViewer.java:402)
 at org.eclipse.jface.viewers.StructuredViewer.preservingSelection(StructuredViewer.java:1353)
 at org.eclipse.jface.viewers.StructuredViewer.refresh(StructuredViewer.java:1455)
 at org.eclipse.jface.viewers.ColumnViewer.refresh(ColumnViewer.java:537)
 at org.eclipse.ui.dialogs.FilteredTree$NotifyingTreeViewer.refresh(FilteredTree.java:1205)
 at org.eclipse.jface.viewers.StructuredViewer.refresh(StructuredViewer.java:1414)
 at org.eclipse.ui.dialogs.FilteredTree$NotifyingTreeViewer.refresh(FilteredTree.java:1195)
 at org.eclipse.ui.internal.views.log.LogView$25.run(LogView.java:1060)
 at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.RunnableLock.run(RunnableLock.java:35)
 at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Synchronizer.runAsyncMessages(Synchronizer.java:134)
 ... 37 more


Reproducible: Couldn't Reproduce
Comment 1 Dani Megert CLA 2010-12-16 05:21:39 EST
Looking at the code:
return (AbstractEntry[]) elements.toArray(new AbstractEntry[elements.size()]);

This rather looks like a bug in the JRE since 'elements' is an ArrrayList which guarantees that elements.size() >= 0.

Suggest to close as NOT_ECLIPSE until we have more details.
Comment 2 Eclipse Webmaster CLA 2019-09-06 15:37:19 EDT
This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet.

If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant.
Comment 3 Julian Honnen CLA 2019-09-09 02:36:54 EDT
Please remove the stalebug flag, if this issue is still relevant and can be reproduced on the latest release.