Community
Participate
Working Groups
Created attachment 183569 [details] Example for a "mashup" that works in SWT but not RAP In many cases, the browser-widget could be used as a much simpler alternative to implementing custom widgets based on our javascript client. The most important features (setText, execute, browser-functions) are already present, but some are still missing.
While i doubt something changed, another look at Bug 243743 would not hurt.
Browser is also missing the getBrowserType() method. It would not be difficult to implement, but i currently see no need to do it.
There should also be an easy way to use resources (like scripts and images) from the bundle within the Browser widget document, idealy single-sourcable. Loading a document into the browser itself is possible by reading it into a string and then use setText, though i find that a bit tedious. But i'm not sure how to easily get a resource to use in a script or image tag.
Closing the Bug. We implemented most features that might reasonably be used to implement custom-widgets/mashups.